I know Q is not a LARP.

Clearly, he knows things and has access to POTUS.

(Lots of people have access to POTUS, however, and have proven to be enemies.)

If I’m thinking logically, there is a [small] chance Q is not on our side.

I will continue to believe he is on our side.

However, when you consider the recent media tactics to inoculate the public to stories about celebrities being involved in child trafficking (Oprah), “The Boy Who Cried Wolf” comes to mind.

(The following is merely exercise. Theoretical. I encourage anons to pick apart these ideas, and prove them to be either true or false. This is a Critical Thinking exercise—something any professional operator would conduct, if they found themselves in our position. If you fear this exercise, then you are harboring secret uncertainty about Q’s validity, and may not even realize it. This wargaming, so please respond with reason, and not emotion.)

I’ve spent 2.5 years telling people that traitors would be punished.

So far, I’ve been made to look like a fool. (And lost credibility.)

This is the exact role that Mossad gave Alex Jones. (Honeypot to centralized attention, distract, and misinformation. But most of all, to publicly brand critical thinkers as lunatics.)

Why would Q give us all of these drops, if he were a black hat?

Perhaps it is information that they believed would come to light, eventually, and mixing in misinformation could create division/confusion/infighting among patriots.

Most of what we know about Q and the plan is conjecture. (Hence, the rush to judgement in datefagging.)

As exciting as the revelations have been, have we actually been armed with anything that makes us “dangerous” to the black hats?

The black hats were perfectly happy to feed small (relatively harmless) truths to Alex Jones, to build his credibility.

Would they use AJ to enhance Q’s credibility? (Sacrifice AJ’s reputation to baptize Q as legit)

As foolish as the DS puppets seem to be, the handlers among as stupid as Q may claim. (They did take over the free world.)

After Trump’s election, wouldn’t they make efforts of their own to regain control over public opinion? Trump’s election would have represented a failure of Operation Mockingbird. In fact, I expected them to let up and disarm Trump’s abrasive style, and lull the public back to sleep.

I was pleasantly surprised when they doubled down. Again, and again, and again. It’s obvious to us that they are playing right into Trump’s strengths, and giving him everything he needs to get re-elected and destroy their cult.

Would this have been just as obvious to the handlers?

For a group that spent generations executing a grand master plan, they seemed suspiciously unprepared for failure. Did they really not have contingency in plaque, if Hillary lost? (They had to have known how unfavorably she is viewed.)

In hindsight, the Russia Hoax seems like almost too perfect of a failure? How could an all-powerful organization like the DS make that many errors on arguably the most important operation of their life? (An operation on which their lives depended.)

Could it all have been a straw man for a bigger play? (Long con)

If they recognized the MSM and Dem Party as lost causes, would their self-inflicted implosion be acceptable? (As long as they maintained control)

Could Q be playing POTUS?

I have no doubt that Trump is our guy. That’s about the only certainty in all of this that I can establish.

Could Trump think he is in on the plan, but really, there is another

A plan?

I’ve never entertained these notions, before, as Iwould have argued that Q has woken people up, and imbued the with a unprecedented sense of devotion and loyalty. Such a thing would inspire awe in the most wicked of men.

If they knew they could obtain this level of obedience, after losing the election to Trump, wouldn’t they be willing to sacrifice all of their [public] assets and [former] mechanisms of control to achieve it?

This question is only now relevant because of the police state in which we suddenly find ourselves. The normies wouldnt revolt, regardless, of who sat on the thrown. But the Patriots, they would be a problem.

Now, we are not a problem. We are compliant, thanks to the anonymous assurances by Q that everything is OK.

Perhaps Trump, too, believes he is about to seize his victory, but is being betrayed, yet again.

Think logically: if you are the DS, and you have this asset (Q), how do you dethrone Trump?

Killing him would make him a martyr, and assuredly ignite a civil war. You would have to separate him from his supporters, before defeating him in the election. You would have to undermine his success, and take away his swagger.

(Continued)

>>8750453

(Continued)

What is Trump’s “weakness” in the eyes of the DS?

He is a compassionate man. He cares about people. He said himself during the campaign that while he opposed socialized medicine, he would never let people “die in the streets.”

So a viral pandemic seems like the logical weapon of choice to fight him. (Especially since he is from NYC, and that is bound to be the place hit the hardest.)

I think we can all agree that the “weaponized” pandemic is a Democrat operation. (Even Q alludes to this.)

It represents the perfect opportunity to usher in the police state. And it would make sense that to wait until the election year to launch it. (The main reason we are all complying is because we believe the Trump economy will restart with a vengeance. Establishing that false sense of hope would be critical, in maintaining our capitulation.

The state is set. It’s a game of chicken.

They bad guys won’t reopen the country, and for whatever reason, the good guys have not arrested any of the influential puppets.

Our hope was that the white hats would blink this weekend— we had comma from Q suggesting as much, In his cryptic riddles, and corresponding statements from POTUS about Easter ending the virus solidified these assertions.

So what happens now? We wait. Wait and pray that the trap is sprung, and justice is served.

But what if it isn’t? How long will we comply with the police state?

What if all they need is a few months to establish total control?

What if all of those tanks being moved around are actually for us, not to arrest the DS? (You don’t need a battalion of tanks to arrest a bunch of crusty old guys, and I think COVID has proven that Americans will comply long before they revolt.

What if they are merely waiting for Trump to demand to reopen the country, only to the release a more potent version of COVID, so many more people die, Trump is blamed, and the economy is permanently destroyed?

The hardest part of pulling off that plan would be getting the millions of [armed] Patriots to sit still, as long as possible. (Many wars have been won, using this tactic— i.e. The Anaconda Plan of the Civil War.)

I believe that Q is on our side. But every leader should be put under this degree of scrutiny, until they truly prove their loyalty to the American People. (Trump has done this, Q has not… not yet.)

Interested to hear compelling counterpoints. Please keep the “shill”comments out of this academic exercise. (I am pro-Q.)

>>8750472

The chans use to be a place to exchange ideas, freely, and engage in debate.

You calling me Linda is no different than a Redditor calling you a Qtard.

This is for the intellectuals in the group. The emotionally compromised will not be capable of engaging. (like programmed normies by the MSM)

If the consensus is that this constitutes heresy, then this place truly has become a cult, and is not the savior it promises to be.

>>8750527

Not the counter-argument I was seeking,

You fail to provide any supporting evidence, and defer to levying insults backed by conjecture.

Put your emotions aside, and think.

I was told this morning that I will likely be losing my job in 3 weeks. So I can assure you, I am upset. But logic and reason must prevail.

Please try again.