Sauce on that graphic if you want to add it as a 2nd post:
Side by side on hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine being part of a CURE for SARS
SARS (Severe acute respiratory syndrome) is now SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2); which is the real name for COVID-19, Corona Virus, Chinese Virus, etc.
Q posted in February 2018: What if cures already exist?
Well it turns out a treatment for SARS existed already and was known to be effective back in the early 2000s when the first SARS outbreak happened. The two papers in the side by side are from 2003 (top right) and 2004 (bottom right).
Of course when Trump, and others by the way, say it can be effective for SARS-CoV-2 also, the media, left, and globalists attack him. They don't want the cures to be used by the American people!
And Q posted in the same crumb from February 2018: What about the billions (public/private/govt) provided to fund cure dev? These people are sick!
They want as many Americans to die in their false flag attack so they can use it politically against Trump's reelection so they try to discredit and dismiss an effective treatment.
Sauce:
https://qmap.pub/read/694
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(03)00806-5/fulltext
(From 2003)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15351731
(From 2004)
https://thefederalist.com/2020/03/23/corporate-media-attacks-trump-for-highlighting-potential-coronavirus-treatment/
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/tucker-opposition-to-trump-is-fueling-media-lies-about-chloroquine-a-potential-covid-19-treatment
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/after-mocking-trump-promoting-hydroxychloroquine-media-acknowleges-might-treat-coronavirus
Here are even more papers and articles about hydroxy from years ago (thank you to the anons who dug them up):
https://www.nature.com/articles/nrrheum.2009.235
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1517/14740338.2011.566555
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0306987716300834
https://www.ijpsonline.com/articles/preliminary-report-of-antihepatitis-c-virus-activity-of-chloroquine-and-hydroxychloroquine-in-huh52-cell-line.html
https://www.premier1supplies.com/p/ammonium-chloride?gclid=EAIaIQobChMItfyis5Xc6AIVmrh3Ch38cAWVEAkYASABEgJPZfD_BwE
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1232869/
booooooooo
inb4 clockfags spew a bunch of irrelevant and incoherent nonsense
Exert from within the graphic:
Q’s clock or The Clock is a figure of speech used to highlight the significance of the amount of time between a Q post and a President Trump (POTUS) tweet or retweet, or between two POTUS tweets or retweets… The Clock is a figure of speech or metaphor but its implications are real. Q and POTUS "use" The Clock, or deltas between Q and POTUS or between POTUS and himself, to establish communication, verify legitimacy, and shout out to the anons who spread Q’s information.
How to "use" The Clock:
-
When Q posts or POTUS tweets, check the timestamp
-
If Trump tweets after Q posts or Trump tweets again after another tweet, check the delta in minutes or seconds for a [0] minute delta
-
If there is a significant delta marker used ([0], [1], [5], [10], [15], [17], etc), make a side by side graphic showing the delta
-
Check for any communications there might be hidden within it
-
Post it, discuss it, and spread it!
Useful links:
qanon.pub
qmap.pub
qanon.news/deltas.html
trumptwitterarchive.com
twitter.com/realdonaldtrump
Full text from within the graphic:
https://pastebin.com/1WiQ1Ak4
I included in this post two blank versions of that little stopwatch graphic in case you want to use it. I don't really use the minute and second one, but might start if Q keeps going closer to gets THE [0:00:00] delta. Let me know if you have any questions or if there are any errors, and would be more than thrilled to discuss the graphic and deltas in general.
Read the graphic anonfren.
>Q first used three deltas to familiarize anons with looking for the time between a Q post and a POTUS tweet or retweet. The first three deltas were [15] minutes, [10] minutes, and [5] minutes in that order. This graphic (the simple stopwatch graphic) is just a way to visualize The Clock as a stopwatch which notes deltas, and is seen in posts about deltas that Q replied to. Q then confirms the minute deltas are between minute timestamps (for now), that a [10] minute delta occurred, and delta markers. Q confirms that delta markers are used differently from other markers. While the [#2] marker, introduced in Q post #247, refers to Andrew McCabe because he was the second in command at the FBI, in the context of deltas, [5] refers to a [5] minute delta and not the number five. After the [5] minute delta in the [15]-[10]-[5] minute delta sequence, anons now know to "use The Clock" by noting the delta between a Q post and a POTUS tweet or retweet (and later between two POTUS tweets or retweets) and make a side by side graphic with the post and tweet in the same time zone. Q also confirms minute deltas are between minute timestamps (for now), that a [5] minute delta occurred, and delta markers; and foreshadows to a countdown using delta markers.