Thank you, Baker!
>>8753167 (lb)
>Democrats colluded with Russians to introduce disinformation into our courts
The aspect of "collusion" somehow escapes me.
If there'd been an "agreement" b/w dems & russians, like:
"You give us disinfo, we give you money" -- then maybe.
But if Dems asked some russians, and russians took the money and just told them some funny story, then that's not "collusion to introduce disinfo".
The point is much more: Dems were dumb enough to believe it's true and corrupt enough to make other people overlook the obvious flaws.
Same for the fisa courts/judges, c_a, fbi and many others.
"Muh Russia" involvement is dry and used up like a 50 year old whore.
>Dan is drawing eyeballs to the stupidity of it all
Kek! Tend to agree.
Seem they learned that from their chinese friends.
>"Muh Russia Collusion Delusion" is wet and juicy and will lead to Weiner laptop.
>Dems paid the "russians" - actually just a shitty writer spy
Well, I'll be waiting curiously.
But not quite "the russians" if it was just one drunk, run-down writer spy.