>>8758062 (lb)
There is a secondary or tertiary level coding in POTUS tweets and Q drops. Beyond "Q proof" timestamps, etc. Different messages are embedded with separate harmoniously conjunctive encryption methods. It's just a matter of time before it's cracked.
>>8748201 (pb)
P.S. BS OPSEC warnings apply to those under contract, NDA, security clearance, etc
If nothing can stop what is coming, then why say stop "speaking" because "the enemy" might get an edge? How is an autistic civ anon supposed to know what messages are "authorized" for decoding and which ones are "classified"? Any messages suggesting 8Kun anons observe OPSEC rules sound shilly.