Anonymous ID: 50b6d5 April 11, 2020, 8:28 a.m. No.8758476   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8494 >>8538 >>8575 >>8633 >>8709 >>8740 >>8834 >>8863 >>8914 >>9012

I'm not going to attack any specific Baker, I do appreciate what they do but there are many frequent issues:

Back in the day bakers would actually read the notables to decide whether or not they are shill garbage, notable, links went to the correct source, and if it was in a recent bread already. This is no longer a normal practice.

I think the problem is being over reliant on "Baker Tools", scripts turning the bakers into human assisted baker bots. That would be fine if the content was being read and verified, links double checked. Seems people are getting lazy.