smart anon. exactly the example i was thinking of. things that might seem statistically improbable might be a lot more probable than u realize.
CHECK MY FUCKING DATA OR NOT I DO NOT GIVE A FLYING FUCK. I AM POSTING THIS FOR YOUR OWN GOOD ASS HOLE.
btw all i am doing is aggregating the data, counting it, putting it in bins, and showing it in a graph. its not hard to do. but apparently, most anons just want to stay blind. i attached all data and the script. i did the work to contribute to the proofs. i personally was expecting to see something else but that is what i found.
give me a specific example and i will do my best. i will give it a shot.
ur literally fucking retarded. u dont understand what inefficient even means in this context. im talking about the O notation. data is still accurate.
you obviously cannot read a graph. that is not what its showing u. jfc.
x axis represents each delta minute starting at 0 and going to 120. y axis represents number of times q and trump posted that specific delta where q posted first and then trump within the same minute.