Anonymous ID: fb3cd6 April 11, 2020, 8:34 a.m. No.8758514   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8574 >>8626 >>8673 >>8781 >>8831

ATTENTION:

 

last year, Q made multiple posts that allured to the idea that him and trump posting within the same minute (where q posts first) is statistically impossible (see: https://qanon.pub/?q=statistically). this is something fairly easy for anons to check to themselves. the delta 0s were some of the most repeated proofs that people were using to show the link between trump and q. so since no one was actually doing the math i took it upon myself to check.

 

during the time i wrote the script to check the stats, i was excited to actually have legit proof that q and trump were linked.. hoping i would see some sort of statistical anomaly. i was planning on using it to wake up my friends. but guess what, i literally proved myself wrong. and i also proved q wrong.

 

as you can see from the graphic, there is literally no statistical significance to the delta 0's at all. they blend in perfectly with all other deltas. its what naturally would happen with two people posting a decent amount every day. in fact, it would be a statistical anomaly if there was NO delta 0 posts….

 

SO… my question is this… why would a TOP LEVEL CLEARANCE military intelligence officer be wrong about statistical significance when they claim to be so precise? it doesn't make sense…

 

im not posting this to be like "ha told u guys!" because i personally have been following Q even since i found this. i appreciate the info they bring. BUT, i am highly dubious they are who they say they are, and i think you should be too.

 

think for yourself.

 

this was done on MARCH 4, 2019…. right around the time q was using words like "statistically impossible". i truly wanted there to be a significance. but there is not.

 

do what you want with this. idc. discern all info for urself. and be careful who and what ur putting your faith in.

 

ive attached all the data i used along with the python script to create the graph (i know its a horribly inefficient algorithm but i dont give a fuck.. it does what i want). i got the raw data using other python scripts (one that utilized twitter api and one that scraped a q post aggregate site).

https://pastebin.com/ZwzqYAzV - q posts

https://pastebin.com/02Ri0mB4 - trump tweets

https://pastebin.com/Sftymxdi - combined

https://pastebin.com/R6H82YcB - python script to generate graph

 

god bless