>>8755317 (PB)
It says we are waiting for you to refute her. If she's wrong and you know why she's wrong, that shouldn't be too hard to do.
Show that there are no / too few kids in the tents / no operations beneath the surface. You can do that by showing either that the tents are empty or that they are full of other patients. Show that there are no troops missing and thus none on a secret mission in the DUMBS or other tunnels. Otherwise account for unusual seismic activity where there are known / long suspected tunnels. Tectonic activity? Accidental collapses? Test explosions?
Use your imagination … but Jenna has a generally positive reputation here, so you need to come up with something other than blind aspersions. Jenna offered only word of mouth from an anonymous source. Unlike CBS, however, she is not known to have lied to us previously. It should be a simple matter to offer some small bit of verifiable evidence that she is wrong and thus triumph over her assertion.
I'm not as gullible as you claim. Otherwise, I'd take both of you at face value. Instead, I take both of you as "unsubstantiated data points."