Anonymous ID: 17530f April 11, 2020, 12:15 p.m. No.8760100   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0344

Mind mapping continued.

 

Anon searched crumbs for 'exchange' (prompted by Q's recent crumb) and found 22 instances.

This isn't complete. The tool is very basic and the writing is much too small.

However I want to point out something I noticed.

 

  1. Upper right corner yellow - Q defines an "exchange" by giving an example then calling attention to it afterwards.

 

  1. Kavanaugh exchange light orange - Dems attempted to derail Kavanaugh nomination. It was a kind of a "exchange" – they hoped to exchange something POTUS wanted (Kav) for something the Dems wanted. Blackmail is their M.O.

 

  1. (also) Lower right light green. A more recent example of an "exchange" where the Dems hold up CARES legislation hoping to get their new green deal in exchange.

 

  1. Left side of graphic - I think there are a couple of different threads here but I haven't categorized them yet.

 

This tool is possibly too basic because you have to arrange the nodes and arcs manually, but it has already proved to be helpful in studying connections across different crumbs.

Anonymous ID: 17530f April 11, 2020, 12:38 p.m. No.8760289   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0315 >>0351 >>0371 >>0453

>>8760181

Reason to do polls: the majority of people are influenced by what they perceive to be a majority opinion.

 

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 Sat 28 Mar 2020 15:15:18 fead75 No.8600954

How does the average person, who is under constant financial stress (by design), find time to research and discern fact v fiction?

Majority of people more prone to believe someone in power sitting behind a big brand ‘news’ name?

Do people [human psyche] tend to follow the ‘majority/mainstream viewpoint’ in fear of being isolated and/or shunned?

‘Mainstream’ is used for a reason [dominate trend in opinion].

[If majority of people believe ‘x’ then ‘x’ must be validated / true]

Why do ‘mainstream’ media heads, within different orgs, always use the same keywords and/or catch phrases?

Coordinated? By who? Outside entity providing instructions?

Do they count on the fact that people [human psyche] are more prone to believe something if heard over-and-over again by different ‘trusted’ sources?

Do ‘echo chamber’ tactics provide validation / credibility to the topic/point being discussed?