Anonymous ID: 80d4e6 April 11, 2020, 4:48 p.m. No.8762110   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2121 >>2124 >>2183

>>8762039

 

Some bakers view the content as extremely offensive, but not because they are scantily clad..

 

They understand that some of those images depict trafficked women. Not all, but a fair portion of them; body language doesn't lie.

 

These bakers likely are also aware that their efforts may literally directly save one or more of those women.

 

This one thinks of that, every time. Especially if the chick looks like she'd rather be a thousand miles away.

Anonymous ID: 80d4e6 April 11, 2020, 5 p.m. No.8762227   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>8762121

 

spare yourself ;)

 

>>8762124

 

KEK

 

>>8762183

 

agreed. wompers be womping either way, kek.. If the shills want to keep putting a point on it, then they will get a non-candy coated retort, is allโ€ฆ it's like wtf, [they] keep wanting to know why?

 

okay. that's why, then. the list is worse than just trafficked women :)