Anonymous ID: fd06ae April 11, 2020, 4:23 p.m. No.8761896   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1930

>>8761872

>i'm not very suspicious, just a digger interested in truth

That's a form of suspicion. It doesn't have to be the negative connotation.

>especially not suspicious of bakers who talk to anons

What about bakers that specifically ask not to receive bewbs? That doesn't activate those almonds of yours?

 

Why didn't the baker just bake and NOT say that?

Anonymous ID: fd06ae April 11, 2020, 4:31 p.m. No.8761958   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2039

>>8761930

But the topic isn't "discussion" is it? The topic is "why would the baker not want bewbs?"

 

That creates a topic of discussion in itself, which is actually more detrimental to other more important discussion or information. Which would be why others (including myself) noticed and called this out.

 

Now the real question isโ€ฆ.why? My theory: the baker girl didn't want competition. POST EM BAKER GIRL

Anonymous ID: fd06ae April 11, 2020, 4:42 p.m. No.8762063   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>8762039

I don't understand, how can you find tits distracting? Tits are literally on my mind 24/7 and I still can live my life

>Many bakers see sexual content as a distraction

Then why are you the only one that's mentioned it?