>>8765304 pb
'Cept JA ain't on "your" side"?
He's a progressive?
You had me going until then.
Also, Breitbart was killed by arsenic
Doesn't matter "when the picture turned up" The data embeded or not, may more likely matter.
Also the provenance.
But with these anon pictures you won't have that.
It hasn't been proved to me that Hussain shooped his face in there
What would be the motive?
There's no signs to me that it was shooped. Can you point out something that shows that it was.
Thinking of the Roasted human on the "movie set" table
"It's a movie" "It's fake"
But they never proved it.
Tarantino.
They expected or believed it to be fake, so they never actually proved it to themselves.
They felt the mockery of "It's a movie" and then just backed off from there.
They were mis-directed.
I thought it was real.
Or anyway was open to that idea, since it was never proved fake.
This image of Hussain is the same.
Never proved fake to me.
I'm open minded. It could be fake. But all the evidence shown me so far fails to prove it.