>>8765829 pb

Sign me up.

I'm not sure there's a O,P,R or S though that's providing leadership and acting as a narrator.

That has ALWAYS been a problem with this whole thing. Everyone is Anon, and Anon can't really do anything the way a person with some kind of identity can.

I was involved in Ron Paul 2007, where there was more enthusiasm on the grassroots side of things than there was an ability to spend the money the grassroots was sending on the official campaign side. We did stuff in the grassroots. We don't do much here. But we didn't make a choice between Q and something better. This is just the way it is.

>>8766360

This seems like something Notable to me, a good list of links to related posts.

>>8766284

You'd think that there would be some website or another that you could trust somewhat.

You have some anonymity on a website like Ron Paul Forums or Free Republic.

You aren't posting your real name there. But people over time know you.

The Chans are great because you can tell the truth about the Jews. You can't do that elsewhere. But you can bash Vaccinators elsewhere.

You get a burner email, maybe use that burner email to get another burner email, and another, and use that email to register and make up a name for yourself. Not that hard.

It would be nice to have some rich Republican (there used to be some of them) bankroll a free speech version of facebook or twitter or google, etc.

>>8766488

we don't know who Q is. I can't say that Q is in charge of delivering hydroxychlorine personally to all those fucking medical idiots who aren't already using it.

>>8766510

hydroxychloroquine

>>8766403

Anybody point out the Pedo Spiral yet?

>>8766550

do you mean TRUMP? If you replaced Q Team with TRUMP, yeah. But we don't really know what Q Team is. So we can't really hand specific powers to an unknown source. Trump is the President, and Trump can do a bunch of things, we don't know who Q is, or who Q team is, and what they can do.

But yeah, Trump said that he'd LOCK HER UP and that hasn't happened.

The reason why we're here is that back in 2017, Q said that Trump was going to be locking up Podesta and Huma immediately.

Yes, we still want all of that. But that was a Trump campaign promise, it didn't come from Q, it was 1-2 years earlier from Trump. When we hear that Huma and Podesta were going to be locked up immediately, we thought "oh, this might be an insider with information about Trump fulfilling his campaign promise about Locking Her Up. I am interested in this, because I want to Lock Her Up."