>Humanity is not yet able to defeat COVID-19. Until specialized antiviral drugs and a vaccine appear, he will infect us.
This doctor has not read, or has chosen to ignore, the many being cured by intravenous vitamin C, by use of andrographis and by chondroitin sulfate. The doctor is part of the problem rather than part of the solution. He's just pushing another brand of Rockefeller medical murder.
Not so excellent. Just another testament to the blindness and evil of Rockefeller medical murder medicine.
>I do some RF work, I know 5G is harmless…until someone can provide a scientific explanation for why it's not
I do "some RF work" too. Helped design & implement 3 generations of cellular communications systems; before that, microwave, point-to-multipoint, 2-way commercial systems, and lots more.
I've also studied the health effects of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and the ways they affect health differently at different frequencies. As an RF-educated fellow, you'll know that the higher the frequency, the higher the delivered energy (therefore more available bandwidth for comms). More delivered energy isn't such a good thing when the RF is impinging on human bodies.
Check out Dr. Martin Pall's breakthrough research on the probable causation: every cell has a membrane surrounding it. Within the membrane are voltage-gated calcium channels, whose job is to regulate the balance of calcium with magnesium, potassium, etc. within the cell. EMFs force open the voltage-gated calcium channels, which disrupts the cell's homeostasis and results in a cascade of chemical reactions leading to harmful reactive oxygen species overwhelming the cell's ability to detox. This can lead to a wide variety of symptoms, which is why previous research has been stymied by all the associated symptoms.
Cytokine storm also plays a role in sepsis. Vitamin C protocol resolves & avoids (if applied early enough) sepsis and vastly improves recovery and survival from sepsis incidents. Yet Rockefeller medical murderers refuse to use it unless forced to do so, and even then they keep the doses so low they cannot be effective.
Moar sauce
Still moar sauce
Is that the same Max Rosenberg of Soviet spying infamy?
>Can you link to sauce on Dr. Martin Pall's research?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3780531/
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/7521102473.pdf
I have lots moar sauce if anons are trully craving moar.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.043
Cancer epidemiology update, following the 2011 IARC evaluation of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields is a comprehensive research review of RF effects in human and animal research. The review concludes that scientific evidence is now adequate to conclude radiofrequency radiation is carcinogenic to humans (Miller 2018). <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.043Several previously published studies also concluded that RF can “cause” cancer, for example, Hardell 2017 <https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2017/9218486/>, Atzman 2016 <https://clinmedjournals.org/articles/ijccr/international-journal-of-cancer-and-clinical-research-ijccr-3-040.php?jid=ijccr> and Peleg 2018 <https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29433020>.
<https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/results/areas/cellphones/index.html>
The US National Toxicology Program (NTP) Study on Cell Phone Radiation found “clear evidence” of cancer, heart damage and DNA damage in a $30-million study designed to test the basis for federal safety limits (NIEHS)<https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/results/areas/cellphones/index.html>. The heart and brain cancers found in the NTP rats are the same cell type as tumors that researchers have found to be increased in humans who have used use cell phones for over 10 years <https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2017/9218486/>. Thus, researchers say this animal evidence confirms the human evidence (Hardell 2019.)<https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254861/>
<https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29530389>
The Ramazzini Institute (RI) Study on Base Station RF was another large scale rat study that also found increases in the same heart cancers as the NTP study found—yet the Ramazzini rats were exposed to much lower levels of RF than the NTP rats. In fact, all the RI Ramazzini radiation exposures were below FCC limits, as the study was specifically designed to test the safety of RF limits for cell tower/base stations (Falconi 2018.)
Tumor promotion by exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields below exposure limits for humans” is a replication study that used very, very low RF exposures (lower than the Ramazzini and NTP study) and combined the RF with a known carcinogen. Researchers found elevated lymphoma and significantly higher numbers of tumors in the lungs and livers in the animals exposed to both RF and the carcinogen, leading researchers to state that previous research (Tillman 2010) was confirmed and that “our results show that electromagnetic fields obviously enhance the growth of tumors” (Lerchl 2015).
>-can that EM be altered with RF?
The short answer is yes. Dr. Pall's work with VGCCs has proven the method of action.
Gotta go help the Easter Bunny. He is Risen!