Anonymous ID: f7f720 April 12, 2020, 6:18 p.m. No.8773738   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3767

Game Theory has a central theme of complications that arise between two entities who can reason through each others success rates and expected moves.

 

"This dilemma, you realize with dread, is general: you must do what your pursuer least expects; but whatever you most expect her to least expect is automatically what she will most expect. You appear to be trapped in indecision. All that might console you a bit here is that, on the other side of the river, your pursuer is trapped in exactly the same quandary, unable to decide which bridge to wait at because as soon as she imagines committing to one, she will notice that if she can find a best reason to pick a bridge, you can anticipate that same reason and then avoid her."

 

In the context of Chinas War against us, we know they have blackmailed and have had control over a vast portion of critical American points of interest. With this, they knew what strings to pull to achieve victory [of subversion] and had the capacity to execute that leverage.

This made decision making easier for them.

 

Consider now, what leverages they have lost:

 

Think CEO departures.

Think FBI departures.

Think DOJ departures.

Think State departures.

Think WH departures.

Think DIA departures.

Think Pentagon departures.

Think Senate departures.

Think House departures.

Think Amb departures.

Think IG departures.

Think Judge install.

Think SC install.

Think WH install.

Think FBI install.

Think C_A install.

Think DOJ install.

Think US ATT install.

…………….

Game theory.

If you look you can see.

Q

 

For each departure China lost leverage and America gained it back. A Zero Sum game.

Now what must China take into consideration before they make any moves? Uncertainty exponentially raises~

To the point of certain failure, should they attempt anything.

In fact what companies we couldn't trust before, may now be trusted if we know China lost its hold on them.

Checkmate.

We are winning far more than we know.

May God Bless Americas Military Intellegence.

 

For a journey of understanding Game Theory: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/game-theory/

Anonymous ID: f7f720 April 12, 2020, 6:18 p.m. No.8773743   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3767 >>3823

Seeing as how the companies [CEOs] have changed, that the procedures for creating vaccines have been revamped, and that Trump is supporting new development of them. We may infer that China can no longer poison them. What Trump suggests, can be deemed safe because he swore to protect you.

 

Which means those that oppose new vaccines, the ones Trump can endorse, have the intention of denying you protection against Chinas virus.

Which means China is in full attack mode, to ensure you die horrible deaths.

No wonder they hate the Doctors who stand with Trump so much 😂🤣😂

 

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-modernizing-influenza-vaccines-united-states-promote-national-security-public-health/

 

Major points of interest:

Changed the incubation method

DIFFERENT ADJUVANTS

Increasing the range of effectiveness

Reducing the dose of antigen required

 

The idea has always been sound, the adjuvants and dosages were the corrupted problem.

He's Making Vaccines Great Again~

 

(Also, if you can, save your/their tonsils. They act as a natural 'vaccination' development station)

 

MONEY.

POWER.

CONTROL.

People are simply in the way.

SLAVES.

SHEEP.

PAWNS.

MASS EXT EVENTS DESIGNED TO DECREASE THREAT LEVEL OF POPULATION.

GUN CONTROL.

WARS [FAKE][TOP HAPPY][BACKEND DEAL].

ELECTION RIGGING.

CONTROL.

YOUR VOICE DOES NOT MATTER.

PHARMA [CLAS-D]

WATER

AIR

CHEMICALS PUSHED FOR HOME USE CLEANING [CANCER][BABY ON FLOOR-HANDS IN MOUTH - THE START].

VACCINES [NOT ALL].

TOBACCO.

OPIOIDS.

ULTIMATE WIN [DEATH + MONEY].

THE FED.

ROTHSCHILD.

'CONSPIRACY'

'CONSPIRACY'

'CONSPIRACY'

UK/GER [5 days].

Choice is yours.

REVELATIONS.

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.

 

The Presidents own Son was afflicted by our corrupted vaccine market.

What would a Father do, for his Son?