>>8773959

>the Y family

>which is Vanderbilt

Show me where Q said that.

>>8774026

Rock = Rockefeller

Y family → Soros

Soros replaced Rockefeller

Rockefeller are family Y.

>The Vanderbilt's are family Y.

Show in the crumbs where it say that.

>>8774109

>Signal for Q to start posting again?

>again

Q legitimately posted over 15 times yesterday.

>>8774134

I've never been either, but that's what I go with honestly.

Q said "Realize Soros, Clintons, Obama, Putin, etc. are all controlled by 3 families (the 4th was removed post Trump's victory)"; but Soros is one of the puppet masters, who replaced family Y which would be the 4th (Rockefeller was removed when David Rockefeller died in 2017).

I think we do this dig every few months or so, kek.

4 families originally:

1. Rothschild

2. Saudi

3. ?

~~4. Rockefeller~~

4 families now:

1. Rothschild

~~2. Saudis~~

1. Soros

2. ?

(Saudis removed after the purge and MbS allying with POTUS). And inb4 Payseur, I've seen almost no evidence they're even relevant today.

>>8774200

Breh, Y Family ≠ YMCA Family ffs.

>Meaning the one Soros replaced never went away. He just took their role.

Up to here I agree. The 4th, Rockefeller DID go away.

It's the 3rd that didn't which you're implying would be Vanderbilt, but there's legitimately no evidence IN THE CRUMBS for that. That's just your outside theory.

>>8774199

Still not 100% on it because of: >>8774184

But I'm like 95% there, kek.

I've always thought that other family would be the Windsor (British Royals). They're extremely wealthy, powerful, and influential.

>>8774258

>He didn't outright.

Q didn't at all is my and other anons' point.

>>8774283

>Get off my balls

<AFLB

heh

>>8774309

If you haven't, watch this documentary.

It's a really good rundown.

>>8774321

>you

Check IDs, dindu nuffin.

I just couldn't resist point that out.

Carry on doing, well, whatever it is you do here.

>>8774338

>inb4 Payseur, I've seen almost no evidence they're even relevant today

Still haven't. While Payseur would fit and you make a good argument for them being there, I just don't see it. They seem like an old and irrelevant family today.

Plus Rothschilds are the world banks which is how they exert their influence.

>>8774363

It's in notables already baker.

But nonetheless still recommend it.

It's a great documentary, and Epoch Times has done some really good reporting lately.

>>8774338

But at least we agree on Family Y being Rockefellers.

I think

>>8774386

Soros replaced Family Y though, you forgot that.

Examples of Q saying this:

>Re-read graphic (ex: what family did Soros replace (Y)).

https://qmap.pub/read/189

>How did Soros replace family ‘y’?

https://qmap.pub/read/142

>The only Logical family is the Vanderbilts.

Not sure why you two are so adamant about that, but there's absolutely no evidence of this in the crumbs.

>>8774421

Pope still makes much more sense in those P crumbs than Payseur. Plus you're saying that it's in fact not Payseur anymore and it's another family, which would agree with my thinking from digs they're not relevant anymore.

I know the InTheMatrix pushed theory about Payseur got a boost from Q's confirmation, but I still don't see it.

>>8774438

Y isn't the YMCA ffs.

Nice IP hop too evidently.

>>8774458

Pretty sure the archiving system on 8kun is still fucked.

Why though? All the crumbs from /patriotsfight/ are on the crumb sites.

>>8774476

That's a title though, not a family correct?

>>8774499

>so even thought Q reposted the P is Paysuer anon post, without a LIVING Payseur, it doesn't shed light on P.

Which is the reason I still can't see it being a ruling family, or even fit most of the P crumbs.

>>8774515

It's David Icke tier ayy lmao shit anyway.

>>8774531

I already replied to your InThePaytrixxx spam.

>>8774578

<hur dur X ≠ [X]

I forgot you can't have a serious conversation with Rainman. Just fuck off and shill harder somewhere else.