fwiw
After sitting with it for a day, outside of all the CIA stuff, it seems to me it wouldn't be enough to bring a solid-enough case to court, so to speak.
From what I have learned so far with everything I've come across these past 3 years, I do believe it does exist, but, from what was presented, it didn't look like there was any real enough "concrete" <ehemevidence to support the "conclusions" being presented.
It was all suspicions and assumptions based on emails and codes that still had enough room for a slick, sleazy but capable attorney to run rings around to get his client off.
idk
With all the Podesta emails, they were only able to extract three "pizza" related content?
That's kind of weak, in my opinion.
And that's all this is anyway.
My thoughts.
My opinion.
Just wondering if others saw it the same way.
Obviously, there's nothing more I would love than to see the likes of Skippy and Hildabeast to get worse than what they've been giving to the innocents all these years, that's why I can't wait for the really gritty crap to finally come out.
So, I guess I'll have to disagree with Q on this being the best doc of the year, but, it is a good opener to get the normies to start waking up.