>>8774619 lb
meh
I've never been fond of this frame. If it suits you though, anon, go for it.
>>8774615 lb
I dunno anon, I'm not really picking up what you're putting down.
They're mystical namefaggots that want us to grant them energy by playing along with their boring and vain LARP.
Don't get me wrong, they're helpful at certain angles. In fact, I think they do more good than they do harm in pretty much every way.
We just kinda ignore their faggotry at this point because BO pointed out a few times how retarded they typically are but Q told them not to play their game.
They aren't important enough to really deploy any meaningful obstacle against them.
After all, why would we spend the majority of our time maintaining the bread flow when we can let the namefags do it and just redpill the normies in the meantime?
The only real trouble they cause is infighting between anons about notables, which, in all reality, is probably still just them trying to spark even more drama so people will recognize them more.
Explaining this is getting old, even if I try to avoid it.
Figure it out.
No, I mean your conscious mind, not the measure of your self-awareness.
The Demiurge is within each of us, just like The Light is.
This is the nature of Duality. This is the nature of the harmonic balance of "good" and "evil" within us.
This explains the overarching theme of Mythology, Fiction and other encapsulating concepts humans use to express their innate and unyielding inner war.
Y is Matriarch
Generation Y
This explains the "satanist" inversion of hierarchical competence.
It's just inversion magick.
Meh.
Maybe the new Lucifer, but not the old one.
He was punished by the "God" of this realm for a reason…
I'm surprised to see you knowing these things, but you're quick to conflate Lucifer (which literally just means light) with Satan.
I get how pedantic this sounds, but it's important to understand that Lucifer was the first detractor because that helps you explain Christ Consciousness, how understanding it has been subverted and why the change occured.
I still can't put in to appropriate words why this is of such importance, but I can't really feel any more confident about it.
There's the Identity, Ego and Superego, anon.
(You) are not your body.
You are the combination of choice within your mortal "mind".
Therefore, each facet of what makes up (You) is defined as such - both ends of balance, or The Demiurge and The Light and your ability to choose between the two.
There's always a choice.
One can always be in The Light and choose to satisfy The Great Deceiver and vice versa.
You seem to think the first choice is the only choice and that is where your confusion arises.
Also, you confuse me only further.
"God" always wins because Creator means harmony and it doesn't mind what choices we make here because it balances either way.
You're hardly providing any friction.
Few will continue to converse with you if you act like this.
Also, I'm very clearly invoking the nature of personal responsibility here.
Each end node has its own objective and they can either falter or pursue it.
What I said very specifically hinges upon personal responsibility.
>That water's not wet!
Is not a fucking argument.
You don't disagree with this…
It passes via the Maternal line.
Q said follow the wives for a good reason.
Trinity…
The very same "God" punished both Lucifer and "Jesus", anon.
This is an important revelation. You must reconcile.
I'm not here to comfort you, confirm anything for you or be friends with you.
If you want our respect, play along with the very specifically configured rules of engagement here.
Until then, you will serve the operation, not yourself, not any other anon and certainly not me.
Fucking play along, or see the list of anons who are suspicious of you increase.
Pretend there's another option, if you'd like. We have literally as long as you will consider going at this.
If this message doesn't apply to you, then great! You've no reason to feel obligated to defend yourself, correct?
The story of Atlas has been told many times.
Thanks for a refresher.
You know, people like you are so tedious. I bet you're great friends with your local priest, aren't you?
Look, anon, I appreciate your attempting to understand this, but I'm disappointed that you can't see the facade for what it is.
Instead of gobbling up [their] simple explanations of bullshit they invented, let me help you a little bit.
"Lucifer" was the first person to defy El, Saturn, Yahweh, whatever you want to call it.
Lucifer tricked "God" and for that he was cast out of the garden.
Just like Lucifer, "Jesus" challenged "God" and was killed by his "chosen ones" (you'll recognize them by their noses).
There's a good reason the Prophet archetype is punished over and over again.
Atlas too waged war against "God"(s) and was punished for it.
You must reconcile.
Then what do you suspect you stand against here, anon?
I feel like you're just sliding…
You keep repeating that people can only make one choice, but we all see plainly that it isn't true.
This is the nature of the abrahamic religion's concept of "forgiveness". This is the nature of the prodigal son story "Jesus" told…
Then why are you defending yourself?
If my message was meant for someone that doesn't follow the characteristics you display or the role you occupy, then what was this response about?
Were you responding to someone else?
You're expending ammunition here to prevent my frame from taking over.
Why?
Makes you wonder if there's a "portal" there, doesn't it?
The guy wants so badly for us to forget that he isn't apart of some team, despite none of us being on any transparent team of our own…
It's almost like our aim is merely individuality and freedom of consensus while theirs is specifically consensus.
Agreed.
I've yet to make up my mind as to their true intentions, but, even if their aim is poor, they ultimately help more than they hurt.
I've repeated this in nearly every post I've criticized them in, yet they seem to feel compelled to defend themselves.
I find this increasingly difficult to explain.
Remember, anons are not divided.
Our disagreement is not evidence of division.
How else would we come to new understandings?
any sauce, anon?
they're clearly continuing this on purpose.
over-saturation will inevitably convince you to hate all parties involved.
This is what resulted with plenty of the websites that had been decent throughout the years but ended up being infiltrated because people were too friendly, productive and focused for [their] liking.
anon, you didn't know that lines respace when you copy and paste… but I'm new?
I've just been sperging most of the bread…
kek
can't blame you, I guess