Anonymous ID: d39534 April 12, 2020, 11:22 p.m. No.8776257   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6270

When will it be confirmed officially that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was the source of the outbreak?

Nobody believes the CCP is being honest.

The information available on the internet as early as January made it clear that the wet market was not the source, and the much more likely scenario is the biohazard-filled laboratory just a stone's throw from where the first cases were and the wet market itself.

Digging into the laboratory and its staff makes it clear that bat coronaviruses were the object of study in this laboratory

When will we learn the TRUTH and what will be the implications when the world finds out where this came from?

Let's go over what we knew then:

>In November of 2015, a University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill gain-of-function study, headed by Ralph Baric, created a chimera using surface proteins from the SHC014 coronavirus and the backbone of a virus that causes SARS symptoms in mice. It was found that this manmade virus could infect human airways.

 

https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/lab-made-coronavirus-triggers-debate-34502

 

>One of the people who co-wrote the paper was listed as the Chinese researcher Xing-Ye Gi.

>Gi works in Wuhan of all places. Key Laboratory of Special Pathogens and Biosafety, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China. BLS-4 laboratory. Just a few miles from the seafood market where the CCP is claiming this outbreak originated.

>match could be confirmed on NCBI's BLAST as early as Jan 2020 with RID: 2PUA1EJK114. The envelope protein for "Wuhan seafood market pneumonia virus" is a match for the envelope protein from Bat SARS-like coronavirus.

>Google scholar identifies Gi as authoring or co-authoring multiple publications on bat sars-like coronaviruses

Everything points to one particular place and the media surely knows it. Why not shout it from the rooftops?

Anonymous ID: d39534 April 12, 2020, 11:30 p.m. No.8776304   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6343

>>8776270

Whether wuxi apptech was involved or not, the facts are settled:

>people worked there who specialized in bat aras-like coronaviruses

>occam's razor dictates that the biohazardous lab right next to the official source of the outbreak is a likely culprit

>a genetic match exists between this coronavirus and one previously under study

What are the implications of this? In the simplest terms, human hands played a role in this outbreak.

Anonymous ID: d39534 April 12, 2020, 11:36 p.m. No.8776339   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8776224

Time would confirm this and I don't think we've witnessed anything of the sort. It's at least not documented.

Not even saying that a chimera is impossible or that something like the envelope protein couldn't undergo change, but this reads like sci-fi.

Anonymous ID: d39534 April 13, 2020, 12:24 a.m. No.8776509   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6642 >>6747 >>6827 >>6905 >>6998 >>7003

>>8776485

Spoke with nurse cousin today. She works at a hospital in a major city. Her actual words were that they "MUST have had SOME" deaths but that she didn't know of any.

I don't believe that the virus itself is a hoax. If the front lines are really as bad as the media is saying, how would somebody like her not know it? Something like 4th of July or New That's and everybody in the building knows it. How does a pandemic not do the same? Extra ICU beds going totally unused. Overprepared.