>>8777904

Repost from last week, or at least I think I posted it then.

Fauci has been Director of NIAID since 1984.

Isn’t that an extraordinarily long tenure in a public position for this day and age? And the guy will be 80 this year.

Apart from Federal judges, I can only think of J Edgar Hoover in relatively recent history to have occupied such a prominent period for several decades, serving under 6 presidents.

Q: Why is Fauci still there?

A: Because someone/s with sugnificant power wants him there.

Whose asset is Fauci? How is he controlled? What has he let take place behind the scenes during the last 35+ years?

>>8777931

Pls excuse typo and autocorrect tyranny.

>>8777984

>Willing participants do not need to be controlled.

Absolutely true. I wasn’t meaning to suggest that he was in any sense unwilling, merely that he is unlikely to have been an independent actor all this time. The CDC appears to function as head of the Medical Branch, which I don’t see anywhere in the Constitution. And to your point about power: clearly he’s loving it. But he hasn’t previously had anything remotely approaching his current public profile or monarchical authority.

>>8778029

Like the Orlando Pulse nightclub nonsense: all part of the op.

>>8778043

I should be believed because muh models were so reliable.

To argue that social distancing is the single efficient cause of the reduction in projected deaths vs the actual outturn is merely to fall for the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy. The lethality of the virus itself has to be the primary driver, surely.