How To Police To Ensure No Baker Censorship
When a baker is refusing a notable that has multiple nominations moving forward the anons should make a post in this simple format to allow the archives to combed and see what info is being left out on a regular basis.
BAKER REFUSING NOMINATED NOTABLE
[INSERT POST INFORMATION WITH TITLE]
example >8780278 MS REMOVES ADD FEATURING AMBROMOVICH AFTER BACKLASH
BAKER ON DUTY = [INSERT BAKER NAME]
For clarification, I am not accusing baker on duty currently of anything nefarious. Just offering a solution moving forward that can be verified. If it is noticed that certain bakers are the ones leaving out important info on regular basis it can then be addressed with facts instead of feelings. Bakers should be welcoming the opportunity to prove they are not gate keeping, and we can put this discussion to bed.