How To Police To Ensure No Baker Censorship

When a baker is refusing a notable that has multiple nominations moving forward the anons should make a post in this simple format to allow the archives to combed and see what info is being left out on a regular basis. Don't argue with the baker, don't get upset. Just catalog the situation. If you argue the shills will attack you and the subject will be ignored. For clarification, I am not accusing baker on duty currently of anything nefarious. Just offering a solution moving forward that can be verified. I suggest a format like this:

BAKER REFUSING NOMINATED NOTABLE

example - >8780278 MS REMOVES ADD FEATURING AMBROMOVICH AFTER BACKLASH

BAKER ON DUTY = [INSERT BAKER NAME]

Anons can then easily search the archive - https://qresear.ch - to see if specific bakers are censoring specific subjects. This should put an end to the Clown baker attacks.