>>878440

Six hours? I'm one foot in the grave…doubt I have had six all week! Take this advice as I mean it in all sincerity, be very grateful for the six hours you are able to get. It ain't fun waking up three times a night just to get four hours, and needing a handful of medicine to get that.

There's a saying, and it's one I used to laugh at:

"Youth is wasted on the young!"

I don't laugh anymore. I would cut off my right arm to get one solid night's sleep and lift this mental fog I suffer. Be very, very grateful for your health anon. Don't wait for it to go before you appreciate it. Six hours of sleep last night…man do you have it good!

>>878664

Cheers. Thank you, and thanks for understanding. Was afraid what I wrote would be misunderstood. My big hope is for healthy anons to lead the battle…afraid I'm just a glorified bystander at this point. Godspeed.

>>878662

I hope it improves for you anon. Quality sleep is without doubt the most important factor to staying healthy. Without the body starts to go, then your mood because you feel like shit. Turn it around, we need you clear-headed and body able on the front lines! Godspeed.

>>878462

Not a techie, but here goes.

As to what information, I agree with the other anon. ANYTHING & EVERYTHING. I don't think you can cast too wide a net as there is probably a lot that's important that we may not recognize until later. Probably safe to say you can't archive too much.

As to how. A simplified answer, to me, has meant something akin to an external hard-drive. Something which, after use, remains offline (and is hopefully free from infections while first being used). What I don't know is what capabilities are built in to 'communicate' when not online. The more you learn about the activity of a cellphone, the more you learn about things you never dreamed were happening. I get the strange feeling E.T. phones home more than we know, but I would prefer not being driven off the road today, so I'll leave it there (probably said too much already). I think Stuxnet is an appropriate model to use when framing this issue.

My question is this. Should communication become 'difficult' at some point, how to we use our archived data to network? How do we communicate electronically, during a blackout on the grid, if one were ever to occur? Some families have a physical meeting place in the event of an earthquake (no cellphones etc.), but how does the Great Awakening community connect in a similar situation?

I have trouble thinking 'saving information offline' is meant to preserve evidence as anything online, to me, seems as if it's instantly copied a million times if important. If someone was able to find the raw footage of those cellphones during the SOTU speech, do you really think they could 'erase/confiscate/bury' every copy? I don't. There has to be another reason…perhaps it's like a Wikileaks dump…to be spread far and wide with a dead-man's switch waiting for the magic signal to release?

What I do know is this. Several major events have had a noticable lack of revealing footage online (or shown on television) and I don't suspect it's because they don't exist.

Way-Koh, the OCItyB, the Pentagon, Parkland, Vegas and Paddock/hotel footage…JFK…Bill and Lotetta's excellent adventure on the tarmac. For each one there is an abundance of rumors about other, yet unseen, footage existing. I think it's this last point Q is referring to…if that makes any sense.

>>879019

Cheers, I'll try to find it. Oddly enough, if my memory serves correctly, one of the players in the 7th floor 'insurance policy' / Steele 'pee-pee' dossier was using one to communicate 'beneath the radar." Want to say it was Nelly Ohr, but don't quote me on it.

I recall watching videos by Dave Acton about ham radios. Yes, sounds like one of the more reliable means for WTSHTF. Thanks.

>>879010

Well said, and I agree. The numbers are being artificially depressed, which sucks, because it only reinforces normies' belief in the artificial ratings. A form of group pressure…I personally know people who would start expressing more positive sentiments about the administration if they felt they were part of a larger group. That's why it's so insidious, but I believe their ability to control the narrative is fading. Roseanne's ratings are a big help.