>>8784112

So that could be way more than 6 individuals, right? Maybe one indictment for each of those 6 groups with multiple individuals named across all.

>>8784254

>I had thought it was 6 individuals but that anon's theory is very interesting.

Indeed!

>>8784259

He hasn't said anything today after being so chirpy lately, can we assume that was just a beer there? He's looking at the sky…his dad just died…

>>8784336

I haven't independently verified every name here, but this one's pretty damn good too.

http://thespygateproject.org/resources/FBI_2016_HQ.pdf