> What's the Baker(s) excuse for not adding these this time?
Baker needs no excuse.
Same argument as "prove me wrong."
Guilty until proven innocent.
Coercion tactic.
FUCK OFF.
shills' only 'problem' is that they are always runing out of shilling ideas, now they' are going for q post archiving sites–new target.
if you want to nom, would be REALLY helpful to provide a short title or description
bakers have so little time to read, analyze and describe an anon analysis or q proof
thx oldanon. LIkely anons will look at Fauci, espec later in the evening. Maybe body language experts as well.
well-said, anon. second.
Laura I lazering in on faulty Covid models, civil rights violations & scientific results on HCQ.
Laura now reminding us of her previous skewering of Fauci – and showing just how wrong he was.
"These people…. I listened to them."
Trump about Fauci & the other "experts"
Laura's pretty sharp–and seems to have a research team that does good work. Also, a good communicator. Started talking about "no denominator" early. Best thing: no pious virtue signalling. Yuck.
slim pickins this bred but you seem to be finding what's there. Tx baker.