>>8786328

>So I've watched the documentary 5 times now.

>I think it was done for the right reasons.

>At about the seven minute mark.

>Michael begins to explain his injury and his subsequent relationship with his Pelvic Floor Therapist.

>I want to ask anons that have viewed the video.

>Does Michael's Pelvic Floor Therapists' account in this documentary count as sauce?

>Why is her identity obscured?

>Would her testimony, as it is in the documentary, qualify as "sauce" ?

>To be completely clear and specific.

>I want anons to answer the question…

>Does the Pelvic Floor Therapists account of actual happenings count as sauce?

>Further more. It is suggested that the Pelvic Floor Therapist has "put back together" women and children that have been victims of satanic sexual abuse.

>So the satanic sexually abused women and children are left alive to be "put back together" by the Pelvic Floor Therapist?

>Does the video provide what anons consider "sauce"?

^^^for those of us that aren't mentally handicapped.

>>8786590

there's a few of them so possibly one of them does. The individual I recognize posts fairly often, daily at least, although I think his posts go well over the head of most onlookers as I rarely ever see anyone respond to him.

anyone else notice there is a work-hour shilling that takes place on this board?

You get the night crew which is the repetitive "know-your-jew" shilling, but the daytime shilling is high-level neural programming shit. I actually avoid the daytime threads simply because it gives me a headache and I even know which posters to block. They often post images with people pointing at (you) and have a large print "scary word" like SCARE!, JUMP!, HATE! or similar.

Anyway, I thought it was odd that there is what seems to be an east coast US oriented shill crew that posts on here. Why can't we remove them? Even in a legal fashion, aren't they technically working to undermine our republic and isn't that a crime?

>>8786705

Just seems like with a war-time declaration and all, we'd be able to send out the troops to literally "shut them down!"

I love the 1st Amendment and I think it's great that people have the right to say offensive shit. Imagine me being a black female jew and i'd still say it's important for people to be able to say offensive shit. However, when organized groups work to subvert the good will of a country, that seems like an act of war to me, not something that should fall under protected speach.

I wonder how fast Faceberg and big-business would stop us from pushing to get legislation blocking organized, orchestrated shilling outlawed? Probably wouldn't take long.

>>8786737

>When the time is right

I figured the timing was getting pretty right.

Offensive things really shouldn't have any effect on people in an anonymous environment. For instance, if I call you a nigger, how can you take offense since I don't have any idea of your race? You may not like the word, to which I would say you shouldn't hand that kind of power to someone undeserving and we would disagree and that would be that. However, the orchestrated, well-placed, well funded efforts are an animal of a different nature. You can tell a lot of money, time and effort was put into some of the campaigns. A legal-fag should really try to define the difference where it still protects free speech but puts an end to organized shilling.

>>8786836

you can't just pull one line out of what I said and fit it into what you want to argue without addressing the rest. I said "Well organized, well funded groups working to subvert the good will of a nation" that has absolutely nothing to do with the idea of an individual or their ability to be heard. If something along this line had been put into place a long time ago, many wars would have been avoided, if not all wars. It's one thing to push facts as a motivational propaganda piece to build ones confidence in themselves and their nation, its an entirely different ball of wax to organize and work to undermine the good will of its' people.

>>8786927

>Jesus was a Jew

Hebrew / Arab

Roman "Give unto Caesar"

Judaism is a religion, not a race. The word Jew didn't exist at the time Jesus was said to have walked the earth. It's a bit counter-intuitive to say the person killed for standing against the practitioners of judaism was a practitioner of judaism. I don't understand how you guys can square that in your head?

>>8786940

So you support majority infraction upon your well-being under the clause of free-speech so long as a group has the financial ability to push an agenda, even if that agenda is harmful to you and your children?

I would stop a gang of people from doing harm to myself, my family or my country. I don't see organized propganda campaigns as being any different than a gang (organized) working to do harm. I would think the only thing worth arguing is what constitutes harm? Within that, there is an argument to be made, but saying there is no due clause to be argued against organized harmful group propaganda seems disingenuous to me.

>>8786957

that's fantastic, can you read English or are you a bot?

>>8786967

>selfless

^^^this word doesn't exist in hebrew. the concept is so foreign to them that they have to piece together parralel concepts to try and form a synonym and it falls short. The closest they can get is "embue with joy"

>>8787003

is that some form of saying you don't have the capacity to discuss the topic?

please enlighten the class, who am I and why am I here? I will post a picture of the street outside my window right now showing you I'm a person in/near Riverside, CA.

>>8786995

So a Christian that repudiates Christianity and dies for doing so dies a Christian?

that, to me, seems ridiculous. You can't even sum that as a value.

a = Christian

a - Christian != Christian

>>8787001

>>8787036

^^^ notice a trend?

Like I said, the day-crew shilling is a much higher-level shilling. This shit is just pathetic. Boring, even.