Anonymous ID: b35ef8 April 14, 2020, 12:18 a.m. No.8787317   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8787183

they are all messed up anon

the black on is THE worst of all.

 

it really makes you think -

 

supposed to be BIBLICAL

supposed to be saving the world

supposed to be back channel from the TOP

 

can't even be sure your getting a true and proper copy of the comms exactly as first posted

 

and most of the time, it simply isn't. no wonder Christians are still arguing about texts. this was foreseeable, warned about and as expected is producing dissent, factions, and confusion.

 

So far in the last two months anon has caught:

 

A purported Q post that was actually an amalgam of two Q posts, with a post number that was different from the two used.

 

A caption that read "Friendly Fire"…except

those two words were in different sentences

and not at all related.

 

A caption that claimed the photograph in a post was of Mao and Maurice Strong. The photo was of W.E.B. Du Bois (Louise Strong is to Maos left as you look).

 

Anons using the blue text (an opinion) as a basis for "decoding"; anons using the non-Q text, that is edited text, as the basis for "decoding".

 

and there's moar….

 

sigh

 

Anons not noticing the redactions of Qs ID, post number, rendering the time as 12hour? Each element of Qs posts contains information, down to the spaces. The post number, time stamps, ID invariably contain information meant to authenticate authorship and

show control, and often point to matters outside the post under review.

 

Non of this is rocket-science. It is there to be read, and shared. If you wanted to show Q posts to someone

a demonstration of Q embedding 17 and 35 and 23 and 911 and 811 and 5:5 all over his posts is more likely than not to grab their attention there are no coincidences its as if every single time anon clicked a Q post anon heard the first six notes of Fur Elise but in his case its numbers that keep repeating

 

and much of this connects to the body of the message as well.

 

all this is lost to anons because for some reason, it has been decided to remove, redact, emendate, re-arrange, caption on a whim as if that IS the PRIME meaning or core intended to be communicated clearly the captions are due to channeling Q

and all this done in silence

 

wow. when anon points this type of thing out anon is called a shill and asked for sauce! amazing fucking chutzpah by the fake anons its unreal. opposing the censor earlier got me threatened with being charged for sedition for saying words which were true

 

sure this place isn't full of Jews, sure…

 

there has been a filter applied to every single Q post, the partisans post that site over and over and over despite it all and not one of them ever issues a warning to anyone on-looking.

 

every single time anon has been attacked for calling them fake Q posts.

 

well they are. they are no more Q posts than the Mayor of London is English. They are trying to pass off the Living Bible as if

it were the Douay Rheims.

 

either the information (which is not theirs to censor) is important, or it is not, so which is it? if its important, why delete it? if it isn't important first why is information encoded in the 1st place,, and secondly can they demonstrate for anons their working on every single post redacted and proof that what was removed really was worthless?

 

and what was it we were supposed to watch for?

baseless speculation? fake or misleading decodes?

 

the captions are a form of manipulation anyway, BIG TIME

blatant.

 

 

the Holy Spirit is not the author of confusion….

Anonymous ID: b35ef8 April 14, 2020, 1:07 a.m. No.8787508   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8787379

anon spotted a post about Trotsky yesterday morning that mentioned his village in Kherson and as I have dug in the past on German colonists in southern Russia and the Ukraine (Orin ND dig) anon thought it would be fun to determine the proximity of the murderer's village to any German colonists.

 

I became distracted immediately by what follows.

It may offer ideas to our intel people / special forces types to leverage whatever good will or memory still remains and also whether these muslims, these

modernizers and their relationship with these Christians offers any ideas? Neat story anyway.

 

These Muslims apparently belong to a tradition that

seems of offer opportunities for…a chat. The books and name you'll find if you read.