Anonymous ID: 6dedd1 April 12, 2018, 11:02 a.m. No.1013513   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>908981

I have the news clips of what was the original number of victims estimated, but not at my finger tips at this moment.

If it had as many people as they claimed were there daily, it would've be ~30K dead - which was the figure originally reported.

That doesn't mean it was empty and no one died.

They lied about the numbers- shouldn't have been ~3K if the building was a full, as it should have been on a normal day, as they describe it. So the News commentators were left with postulating a lot of people slept late that morning. KEK

Didn't add up. And still doesn't.

Doesn't mean empty, though. And there are vids. images of people swarming in there in the morning. Up the escalators.

That's a lot of building. And I can also only think that those who promote the idea that the Towers were empty, never walked by there, nor saw the building, nor ate at the restaurant on the top floor?

 

Also, why would people be called not to go to work, if they didn't work there?

 

I know there wasn't dead bodies, except ones outside the perimeter of the actual footprint of the Towers; And I was told those were charred beyond recognition. Whatever: One fireman source for the charred body info, and I had to press him.

 

[bodies were dustified as was everything else, bathroom sinks, toilets, computer terminals, elevator, elevator shaft, steel beams , etc.,…]

 

You have to understand all the firemen are under gag order; Or lose their pension and job. Many have relatives in the same brotherhood. Those family members, also, would be threatened if any one individual among them spoke out.

 

The firemen do know.

 

I have one splatter image of an alleged jumper. And was told jumpers twitched around before they died. Maybe it needs more research?

 

I don't necessarily believe Judy Wood's ability to interview witnesses. Not at all. She messed up with the "plane" witness analysis, for sure. [In her book she describes her interviews with those who witnessed the "raining bodies" ]

 

"Simon Shack" the main proponent of "No One Died" theory, has all the qualities of a hang-out artist - creates a cult around himself which allows no questioning.

 

Accuses other researchers, who are in good faith, of working for the government - and accuses some, even, of being 'VicSim" models themselves ["VicSim" =his word for fake CGI fake victims].

 

Bans people who are up on the research and who question. Cultivates newbies and innocent seekers as acolytes.

 

Why would there be a high level hang-out artist to promote "No One Died" theory If it were true?

There wouldn't be.

SS claims they don't want anyone to know they kill people.

What?

 

As I see it:

It's just easier to deal with the victim issue if it's a smaller number.

Look at the trouble one victim's wife caused? They had to down a plane to kill her. Magnify that by 10Xs. That's why they had to limit the number of victims.

The guy who pushes "no one died" along with his followers [the usual suspects], works under a pseudonym [normal in this case], his dad was Intel Norwegian, lives in Italy and his brother races cars under sponsorship of bin Ladin. He's also a sophisticated Flat Earther.

 

He did the best vids, to start, on the plane simulations.

 

They hook 'em with the good info then lead 'em down a blind alley.