Anonymous ID: 0fe1e6 April 14, 2020, 11:02 p.m. No.8799670   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9759

>>8799628

 

That when the Nazis made it their main symbol,

All of American bowed down and submitted to the Nazis and said, OK you can have our symbol and we will cease to use it. You win.

 

Later on, although an attempt was made to defeat the Nazis on the battlefield, it failed and the USA surrendered to the Nazi Cabal, headquartered in Switzerland. Of course the Nazi Cabal was a subgroup, so the USA helped them get rid of their enemies at Nurnberg, and raided the Nazi bases in Neu-Schwabenland were the Nazi's advanced aerospace technology had been stashed by one faction. That tech was brought to the USA along with all the Nazi rocket scientists and nuclear scientists.

 

After the war was closed, the Nazis slowly infiltrated the rest of the US government and by 2015 were almost ready to wipe out the Constitution.

 

Fortunately, Military Intel had been planning a coup for a long time, to be waged carefully and silently to minimize the chaos and death that happens in a normal war.

 

And here we are, nearing the final battles to clean them out altogether.

Anonymous ID: 0fe1e6 April 15, 2020, 1:44 a.m. No.8800294   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>8800251

>http://archive.vn/zuBR3

 

Roemer appealed again, and this time the court asked for the technical services of the Federal Criminal Office (Bundeskriminalamt, similar to our FBI), which carried out a careful analysis of the original manuscript of the diary with microscope and ultraviolet illumination in order to confirm its authenticity โ€” in particular, to determine when it was written.

The report of the technical experts was given to the court in April of this year, and it contained a bombshell: large portions of the alleged โ€œdiaryโ€ were written in ballpoint pen ink โ€” which was not manufactured prior to 1951!

Were it not for the previous testimony of the handwriting experts that the entire diary, including the portions written with ballpoint pen, is in the same hand, the father might have claimed that he only โ€œeditedโ€ his daughterโ€™s work, โ€œclarifyingโ€ passages here and there. But the evidence was quite unambiguous.

For example, the testimony of Hamburg graphologist Minna Bekker in an earlier trial was: โ€œThe handwriting of the diary in the three bound volumes โ€” including all notes and additions on the glued-in pages as well as the 338 pages of loose material โ€” including all corrections and insertions is identical . . .โ€

Otto should have been more careful in his choice of writing instruments. It is now quite clear that he finished hoking up the โ€œoriginalโ€ of the diary after he had found a publisher for what, in 1946, was nothing more than some rough notes and an idea in his head which seemed to have prospects for making him a lot of money with little effort. First a typescript for the publisher, and then, as sales of the book began to mount, a completed handwritten โ€œoriginalโ€ to show to doubters.