Logical Thinking: My Comment on the Notable Headline:

>US Pentagon’s top general says COVID-19 has natural origins, but questions remain

https://intelnews.org/2020/04/15/01-2758/

The facts are, mankind is nowhere capable of creating a viral bio-weapon from scratch yet.

Not even close.

Crisper capacity is the best tool known to the public at the current time. It is only capable of splicing what nature has already assembled in the way of viral or bacterial codes.

Codes are like the sentences in books. You can splice a sentence from one book into the paragraphs of another. The books are nature's product.

Therefore:

ALL viral bio-weapons have a "natural origin".

Meaning the code for all viruses comes from nature.

We have to start with "bat viruses" or other kinds of viruses, then, they are altered.

So yeah.

The question is not one of "origins".

The question is one of "man made alterations" vs natural alterations.

Too many alterations over too short a period of time especially too many alterations at the SAME time, would indicate man made alterations.

Alterations that show whole exact code sequences that "originate" in totally unrelated viruses (for example, natural but exact HIV code chunk -sentences, stuck on a corona type virus book, would indicate a man made alteration.

…..Finding an HIV sequence in the CORONA, is like finding the sentence "Mary had a Little Lamb" in the middle of the Gettysburg Address.

Bit obvious.

And we DO know the sequence sentences, due to the extensive global virus libraries.

But who needs a pissed off population and a war over the facts, which would do more harm than the virus itself. (Also, logical thinking)

Nice job General Milley.

The public does not really understand the science of splicing.

But Chinese researchers do, as well as US researchers.

If push comes to shove, make sure people understand what really happened, and trust that they will deal legally with the "Silent war" bio-nukes, without using the real nukes in an outright noisy obvious war. We are with you. The biologic would not be worth producing if we widely used the new technology 222 nanometer human safe germicidal light. I looked at it. It kills viruses/bacteria but does not get through dead layer of skin or even water layer on the human eye.

Only downside I can think of, is, it MAY also kill normal floral bacteria on the skin and leave human skin defenseless against pathogens the way that current hand sanitizer does.

Too much sanitizer on the hands, kills off normal hand flora, and people start getting skin infections on their hands over time, because there is nothing to stop the pathogens from taking up residence. Otherwise, the 222 is a great idea for safely killing virus/bacteria indoors.

Just my thoughts.

Logical Thinking: My Comment on the Notable Headline:

>US Pentagon’s top general says COVID-19 has natural origins, but questions remain

https://intelnews.org/2020/04/15/01-2758/

The facts are, mankind is nowhere capable of creating a viral bio-weapon from scratch yet.

Not even close.

Crisper capacity is the best tool known to the public at the current time. It is only capable of splicing what nature has already assembled in the way of viral or bacterial codes.

Codes are like the sentences in books. You can splice a sentence from one book into the paragraphs of another. The books are nature's product.

Therefore:

ALL viral bio-weapons have a "natural origin".

Meaning the code for all viruses comes from nature.

We have to start with "bat viruses" or other kinds of viruses, then, they are altered.

So yeah.

The question is not one of "origins".

The question is one of "man made alterations" vs natural alterations.

Too many alterations over too short a period of time especially too many alterations at the SAME time, would indicate man made alterations.

Alterations that show whole exact code sequences that "originate" in totally unrelated viruses (for example, natural but exact HIV code chunk -sentences, stuck on a corona type virus book, would indicate a man made alteration.

…..Finding an HIV sequence in the CORONA, is like finding the sentence "Mary had a Little Lamb" in the middle of the Gettysburg Address.

Bit obvious.

And we DO know the sequence sentences, due to the extensive global virus libraries.

But who needs a pissed off population and a war over the facts, which would do more harm than the virus itself. (Also, logical thinking)

Nice job General Milley.

The public does not really understand the science of splicing.

But Chinese researchers do, as well as US researchers.

If push comes to shove, make sure people understand what really happened, and trust that they will deal legally with the "Silent war" bio-nukes, without using the real nukes in an outright noisy obvious war. We are with you. The biologic would not be worth producing if we widely used the new technology 222 nanometer human safe germicidal light. I looked at it. It kills viruses/bacteria but does not get through dead layer of skin or even water layer on the human eye.

Only downside I can think of, is, it MAY also kill normal floral bacteria on the skin and leave human skin defenseless against pathogens the way that current hand sanitizer does.

Too much sanitizer on the hands, kills off normal hand flora, and people start getting skin infections on their hands over time, because there is nothing to stop the pathogens from taking up residence. Otherwise, the 222 is a great idea for safely killing virus/bacteria indoors.

Just my>>8801512

thoughts. >he used totally synth material

>but inserted into existing cell nucleus

Interesting.

What do you mean by synthetic material?

Was it coded assembled DNA or RNA, without previously existing pattern to copy? Because the odds of randomly coming up with a working sequence that could divide from scratch are astronomically against. It would be like writing code for a new quantum computer with error correcting code, from scratch.

Or was this scientist using a previously existing sequence and just re-assembling from scratch?

If you have the research for this, would love to have it. Have not heard it.

>>8801556

>>>8801539

>Instead of putting people's tax money into schools, take that tax money, give it back to the people thru tax cuts, and let the ones that want to home school do it, and the other ones who can't won't can use the money from the tax cuts to put their kids into private schools.

>Or something like that, just an idea.

The BEST IDEA.

Add to this, a return of the "Parent Teacher Association" where parents met with school board members and teachers once a month to decide such things as textbook use, and teaching topics. With today's internet, parents would be way ahead of the school boards and busy teachers, when designing curriculum ideas to bring to the meeting for discussion. We would have Kick ASS schools again.

It is irrellivant that some parents will not attend (work, school, other reason). What use to matter is that a good chunk of parents who had the time and gave hard thought to the question of curruculum showed up in good numbers for each school, after doing some really great homework. In addition to that, the parents brought personal "networks" from work and other expertise in, when the school was needing some strange info/advice.

Parent knowledge specialties, and special connections are a boon to schools.

The feds cut parents out of school decision making so they could dumb down the schools and make it impossible for parents to actively improve their own children's schools in coordination with the board and the teachers, on a monthly basis.