https://thehappyscientist.com/content/when-does-theory-become-law
Enoch on twatter noted that he was disappointed that Q says we are beyond proofs as he has been performing them for 2 years now.
The idea that Q is a theory and any theory, becomes a law when proven beyond a doubt? Is Q signifying we have advanced to the law zone? Or that Q has everything in place to start exercising laws. Seems to dovetail with some of the other posts.
Do you ad to a current theory or create a new one and keep performing proofs? There seems to be something here, but maybe I am missing it? I have overlooked small stuff before, or I am looking too hard. Could use some input from science fags.