>>8815008 (pb)
"eternalize it digitally???" can you technoweenie millennial twits really be that freaking stupid? besides the fact that digitally stored info is vulnerable to hacking, editing, and revision by every future "ministry of truth" that comes along, who is going to be able to access it when an EMP puts us back into the stone age? you wanna "eternalize" it, carve it in stone, dumbass. at the very least, print hardcopy illustrated books. millions of 'em! once they're printed, no one can revise an original edition.