Anonymous ID: bdc483 April 17, 2020, 10:10 a.m. No.8826100   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6602

>>8826049

>the board the way

The board is fine? The board is working better now than it has been in weeks.

Q posting after Trump is irrelevant. Anyone can post after POTUS, the proof Q coordinates with him is when Q posts inb4 POTUS.

But do what you want.

>>8826055

I mean if it's a few seconds that's just +/- but if Q posts like 50 seconds after Trump I don't really think it's a [0] delta tbh.

Anonymous ID: bdc483 April 17, 2020, 10:28 a.m. No.8826358   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6389 >>6402 >>6416 >>6429

>>8826267

I'll just quote Q:

Patriots: be cautious in your interpretations of info posted. False expectations [& push] based on 'speculation' will only weaponize those who attack us [MSM].

 

To be fair: I can only these 0 deltas confirmed by Q that was Q after POTUS in the crumbs, and that was https://qmap.pub/read/2891 which was an 11 second delta with Q after POTUS; and https://qmap.pub/read/2143 which was a 10 second delta with Q after POTUS. The other one wasn't posted as a [0] delta, anons were just noting there was a 17 second delta with Q after POTUS.

When you get more than 15 seconds, it becomes to easy to refute. If Q posts after Trump by 59 seconds, I really don't consider that a meaningful delta.

Again, do what you want, but be prepared for anons and others saying it seems irrelevant for such a large 0 delta to happen when Q posts after Trump.

Anonymous ID: bdc483 April 17, 2020, 10:33 a.m. No.8826420   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6448

>>8826389

I know. Still worth discussing for clarity.

I'd love to see an exact 0:00:00 delta, or Q and POTUS post the same thing with a 0 delta.

That'd be cool but it's not needed now.

Q has more than confirmed their legitimacy to anons.

>>8826402

>Why should I change my opinion based on other anons

That's something called being intellectually honest.

>>8826416

Yup

Anonymous ID: bdc483 April 17, 2020, 10:47 a.m. No.8826597   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6645

>>8826544

>>8826553

>>8826548

>>8826566

"Qclock" faggots can't refute this because it BTFO their slide:

 

The Clock Explained:

 

I made a long graphic which I think explains what Q meant when Q said The Clock, how Q introduced The Clock, and how Q and now anons have been using The Clock. It starts by explaining what deltas are, what markers are, and how Q posts number markers (aka "delta markers" colloquially to distinguish from normal markers not related to deltas) to use The Clock and signal deltas are coming or confirm deltas happened. The graphic explains how Q started with a countdown using a [15] minute delta on November 4th, 2017, then a [10] minute delta on December 12th, 2017, and finally a [5] minute delta on December 23rd, 2017. After that, the graphic explains the [15] minute delta to [1] minute delta where "consensual" was changed to "consequential" on January 7th, 2018; which is also the date Q explains The Clock. Q also introduced the [0] minute delta on that day, and the graphic shows when Q used [0] minute deltas to verify the new tripcode here on 8kun on December 2nd, 2019 as an example of a [0] minute delta and how Q and POTUS "use" The Clock. Finally the graphic explains Q has used many other deltas like a [17] minute delta, a [30] day delta, and a [1 year] delta; and shows the recent example from January 3rd, 2020 of when POTUS corrected a random "q" in his tweet with a [17] minute delta. I also put an example of a graphic and a simple "How to" at the end with useful links.

 

There's always a lot of discussion on what markers, The Clock, the map, and other things related to Q are, and I think this graphic is a clear way to show what Q meant and continues to mean by The Clock. The graphic is long and laid out to go from beginning to end chronologically, and should only take a few minutes at most to read through which I really suggest you do. EVEN RECENTLY Q used The Clock with the [0] delta, showing how important and useful The Clock still is! It's still relevant, and many anons know this but I think it's a good graphic and concept to study and understand. It should be fine to view on 8kun normally, but if needed open it in a new tab. I included in this post two blank versions of that little stopwatch graphic in case you want to use it. I don't really use the minute and second one, but might start if Q keeps going closer to gets THE [0:00:00] delta.

 

Exert from within the graphic:

Qโ€™s clock or The Clock is a figure of speech used to highlight the significance of the amount of time between a Q post and a President Trump (POTUS) tweet or retweet, or between two POTUS tweets or retweetsโ€ฆ The Clock is a figure of speech or metaphor but its implications are real. Q and POTUS "use" The Clock, or deltas between Q and POTUS or between POTUS and himself, to establish communication, verify legitimacy, and shout out to the anons who spread Qโ€™s information.

 

How to "use" The Clock:

  • When Q posts or POTUS tweets, check the timestamp

  • If Trump tweets after Q posts or Trump tweets again after another tweet, check the delta in minutes or seconds for a [0] minute delta

  • If there is a significant delta marker used ([0], [1], [5], [10], [15], [17], etc), make a side by side graphic showing the delta

  • Check for any communications there might be hidden within it

  • Post it, discuss it, and spread it!

 

Useful links:

qanon.pub

qmap.pub

qanon.news/deltas.html

trumptwitterarchive.com

twitter.com/realdonaldtrump

 

Full text from within the graphic:

https://pastebin.com/1WiQ1Ak4

 

I included in this post two blank versions of that little stopwatch graphic in case you want to use it. I don't really use the minute and second one, but might start if Q keeps going closer to gets THE [0:00:00] delta. Let me know if you have any questions or if there are any errors, and would be more than thrilled to discuss the graphic and deltas in general.

>>8826547

The fact you don't know how rainman/megashill is confirms everything I need to know about you.