dChan
Anonymous ID: a5936d April 17, 2020, 4:18 p.m. No.8830291   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0330

>>8829966

His comparison was hugely flawed. 2 scenarios – spot the difference:

 

Scenario 1

—————-

1) Got tested for HIV and results = negative.

2) Goes six months without fucking any strangers up the ass, sharing rusty needles with monkeys, etc.

3) It is now 6 months after test, is good to go, still no HIV, and no additional test needed, GUARANTEED

 

Scenario 2

————————————–

1) Get tested for CV-19, results = negative.

2) Next day, might have contracted CV-19 and must get tested again to be sure doesn't have it.

 

Anyone see a difference ?

Anonymous ID: a5936d April 17, 2020, 4:23 p.m. No.8830435   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8830330

What I am saying is we have the same opportunity to mitigate our risk of contracting CV-19 after testing negative as we do for mitigating our risk of contracting HIV after testing negative. Do you see anything about mitigating risk of contraction in Scenario 2?

 

Why not?