Some thoughts on:
[Set 1]
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
[et al]
[et al]
Is this all in the first set? The way it’s written it reads as if all of those are part of [set 1].
How many sets are there?
The six numbers, are those to be filled in with names indicted in the first [set]?
TBQH, if Durham isn’t expected to publish his report until summer, this seems to be a bit premature unless he is holding off on it to overcome the media going insane over who is indicted.
I think that could be implied as anyone int government (thinking SES and others). Remember that the courts don’t count them as civilians, they are “civil servants”. But it could be military as well, we shall see.
found the illegal
Been thinking that they will try a resurgence later in the year to really push that mail in voting.
Keep hearing that we shouldn’t expect this to go away, it will come back. Seems like it’s programming/preparing for us to just “accept” them saying that it’s back.
The kicker will be that it will be far out of flu season, and they will blame trump for reopening the economy too soon.
Just wait for it.