Thought…

Who is helping POTUS - Durham

and now we got this crumb…

Q!!Hs1Jq13jV6 15 Apr 2020 - 8:28:00 PM (timestamp qmap)

We are far beyond the need for proofs.

You have more than you know.

Durham start.

Q OP start.

5:5?

Q

The first crumb with the Q signature was nr 61, the next was 64 with the sentence "God bless - I must go for good at this point."

In the crumbs before, it was more than one crumb with I… for example

Anonymous 1 Nov 2017 - 5:48:20 AM (timestamp qmap)

I’ve dumped some crumbs like this over the weekend which started the intense shilling. At this point we are far enough along you can paint the picture without risk of jeopardizing the operation.

or this one reads now like an invitation to the mission (from Durham?)

Anonymous 1 Nov 2017 - 6:27:03 AM (timestamp qmap)

Any person making statements they will not be seeking re-election was put in submission. For the betterment of the country not all will be prosecuted and all will do as told. You will see more of this occur (not normal yet disregarded) and even on the D side.

or this one

Anonymous 1 Nov 2017 - 7:51:49 AM (qmap)

I’m hopeful my time spent here was not wasted.

Note few if any shills inside this thread. Reason for that. It’s being monitored, recorded, and analyzed and don’t want the clutter.

Take good care. God bless.

I will try to explain what I mean. The first crumbs without Q sig, are like "explaining" the operation…

Is it possible, that John Durham wrote these crumbs and has to "go for good" to get these assholes with his investigations?

Is there more info to find in the first crumbs as we know (not really a question…)? I don´t want to doxx Q. Just asking autists to look again at these crumbs, with regarding the Durham start, Q OP start. We know, nothing is random…

(I will do it, too! But more eyes are better, me thinks)