>>8837177

that a a way to monitor the use of them. Maybe they are also needing some kind of side device, a ballot tagging tabblet that the use of it is monitored and anything is messed with it calls in a physical audit.

in my localle the ballot place is always run by witch-seeming old people or wizzard types who seem gleeful in the deception of it actually mattering how we vote.

I don't believe that the daughters of the American Rev or the Leaucge of women voters are honest people with anyone else's interests at heart.

why do they have a monopoly of the vote day jobs?

>>8837215

the method of voting by ballot is obviously allowing the fraud that the vote staff aren't just fixing elections.

voting needs to be initiated and performed by people who are independant of freemasons and cult-culb fraternity heathen paegan cults.

the 'temple cult of BAAL' should be removed from responsibility.

of course I'm giving a description that is playful and allegorical?

The people who are there on voting day, and the ones who gather and count . . . we need to know who they are. We don't really know who they are or why they do this job.

how does one get involved with it?

maybe only unaligned people from somewhere else should run the vote? But we know that doesn't work either.

We bring in millions of foreign people but they all seem to be . . . part of the larger control culture.

voting and how votes are gathered is a show that is designed to make people imagine that they have some effect. The truth is different from what they want us to think. If there are honest people amoung them anymore I doubt it.

Voting needs to be removed from city hall and all of the commerce and cult party-behaviors of fetish activasts of the sex-drug cults.

that seems who are running things in a lot of towns.

It's just fuedalism. It's not democracy.

>>8837370

how do you like it?

we need methods that remove the sex-cult-communist democrats from the place where they run elections or count votes.

the voting needs verification, and the method of deciding (1) who gets to be on the ballot (2) what the positions are on the ballot. (3) how the vote is made and paid for.

who profits from the voting

who runs the voting

who decides what jobs are given by voting

the system is very broken

we have fuedalism in a lot of towns (Not all towns, it depends on the people)

and from that we knit together counties and then states.

we see situations where some end up bascially being fuedal lords of a region.

paper or tablet ballots or voting in a secured and monitored way would help us to know if counts were correct and people real, however . . . the problem of the system being fuedal and the positions of governance being inherited from generation to generation by a line of people . . . still is not solved. Paper or plastic or electronic ballots and perfect counting won't matter because the counters and the ballot writers are still compromised democrat-marxist drug-addict sex cult victims in some areas. (available only in some areas).

so . . . the problem isn't really about voting at all. And that is a distraction (or an ongoing pursuit).

for me that Hanging-Chad affair (no it wasn't a government sanctioned execution) was that not only do we not have a way to know that voting is correct, we really don't have a way. Is that confusing?

>>8837440

if the people are honest, and let's hope most are, then the vote will be too. And no matter what the method, dishonest vote counters can fake the results. if the system were imposed upon the fuedal town (many towns wouldn't be that way) then the vote would perhaps be correct, and the bad governance would be removed from power.

They still exist, and they still probably work for the state or the town or the county or maybe even the Federal governance, or even the federal bankers. They don't disappear from the world when they are voted out of office.

When those people are honest the world is a better place. Unfortunately the cult of cuckoldry and nipple chained governors . . . rules in many seats of governance.

no matter how the votes get tabulated, or how the vote for what is decide (what are we voting about) when the people in charge of process are tethered to an abomination cult with a nipple chain . . . the result of that governance will only be as good as the cult will let it be.

so if it's a cult that wants evil things?

how do we escape it?

unthether them.

POTUS tries to do it, to let them be free. But they crawl back into their well watered cages and go right back to the source that they've been trained to call 'sir'

>>8837456

The Pantheon

build things that last and that are useful for the public and they are often preserved.

>>8837244

I'm clear on that my view is my town and that its a system knitted together, town to town.

if the localles percieve no problem and are happy with the situation, imposing new methods for local elections seems draconian to me.

yes, with 10 million out of work we need a process of instant cacausing and also much more rapid recall for people that violate constitutional rights with edicts needlessly, like the governors of various blue-state regions.

yes, when good people and honest people run the vote, we don't need to impose arduous rules about voting. and methods designed to enrich some view, that are compromised out of the box like most of the electronic voting seems to have been.