>>8837213

>>8837213

>in my localle the ballot place is always run by witch-seeming old people or wizzard types who seem gleeful in the deception of it actually mattering how we vote.

>I don't believe that the daughters of the American Rev or the Leaucge of women voters are honest people with anyone else's interests at heart.

>

>why do they have a monopoly of the vote day jobs?

They do not, in spite of how that may seem at a glance.

If there are 10million Patriots out of work, I'd like to think the volunteer's demographic would look considerably different.

>>8837208

>Did John Kerry [Knowingly] help arrange this on his globe-trotting shadow gov’t BS “diplomacy”?

His daughter married an Iranian nuclear physicist (?), so I'm pretty sure he would no have prejudice or ulterior motives. NOT

>>8837256

That whole scenario may well be moar likely than most anons realize. If you simply take Barbara Bush's reported connection with Alister Crowley and look at the implied repercussions (follow the wives) it further confirms that likelihood.

>>8837252

Antoine Bechamp was THE man; and ahead of the game in those days.

Louis Pasteur got the then current acclaim and went on to father the largely inacurrate 'germ theory' that is the basis for the bulk of the current lies being fed the global public.

There is an expanded analysis/comparison of this in the book about Royal Rife and his 50 year old cure for cancer.

The name of the book escapes me, but it is available online as a .pdf file. VERY highly recommended reading for sure.

>>8837330

It is utterly impossible to logistically deny that possibility.

Still, I wouldn't make such a statement without including McDonalds and Walmart.

Ironically, in both those cases the Founders would NEVER allowed that to happen,

but the subsequent ownership would seem to have had NO PROBLEM with it.

>>8837238

This is interesting.

Had not seen these claims made relating to this latest Corona Hoax.

Anybody woke enough to be familiar with the rash of Holistic doctor deaths and lengths that the FDA and the AMA (among many others) will go to in order to suppress 'the cures', will now be looking at this and scratching their heads asking Why don't they want the sheeple to be aware of this?

Do your own research, decide for yourself. The premise is sound.

Is the 'real' problem (for [them]) that it is cost effectively affordable and cuts Big Pharma out of the loop? Nah…. that couldn't be it!