Anonymous ID: 62cbc9 May 7, 2020, 2:54 p.m. No.9070029   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1541

>>9065638

>>9065638

 

Well, - in muh opinion: Seems you are not starving your Dog - the intruders didn't shoot it for trying to eat dem….

 

You do have the right to starve: But why? It's not Remedy - and your Dog needs you.

 

That stated: If you have done no harm (no victim), then ; COMMERCIAL LIENS A MOST POTENT WEAPON

http://www.usa-the-republic.com/jurisprudentia/commercial%20liens.html

 

The Commercial Lien Strategy - Background

 

Faced with corrupt lawyers and judges, no litigant can expect to win in court by simply playing defense. To beat them, you must be able to scare them. You must be able to make them respect you, and that means you must be able to take the offense – attack them personally.

 

Unfortunately, judges, lawyers, and other government officials enjoy various levels of personal immunity provided by both law and "professional courtesy." How do you sue a lawyer for malpractice? You hire another lawyer – if you can find one who'll take the case. How do you sue an IRS agent for violating your Constitutional rights? Only with great difficulty. How you sue a judge for railroading you in court? You don't.

 

As a practical matter, private citizens can't sue the President of the United States, a Governor, judge, or even an IRS agent for failing to obey or enforce the laws. If we try to sue in court to compel our government officials to obey the law and perform their lawful duties, the judges routinely ignore our petitions and laugh us out of court.

 

Because legal and de facto immunities shield government personnel from being sued for committing crimes against the People, the public is legally disarmed, unable to aggressively sue the government or its agents and compel them to obey the Law. As a result, the public's legal posture is fundamentally defensive: we try to duck, dodge, and hide in legal loopholes to defend ourselves against the government and the courts. We try to escape, evade, and avoid, but we seldom counter-attack against our antagonists, largely because we think there are no lawful weapons to do so. However, it appears that a powerful offensive legal weapon may now have been discovered, tested, and proven for common Citizens – the commercial lien. We don't try to sue a government official for failing to perform his lawful duties. Instead, we simply file a lien that encumbers the official's personal property and credit rating like a ton of bricks until he voluntarily satisfies our demand to perform his lawful duty, and we, in turn, voluntarily agree to excise the lien.

Anonymous ID: 62cbc9 May 7, 2020, 5:47 p.m. No.9072360   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8388

>>9071541

 

IT begins with: I-AM:NO-CONTRACT. [but I CAN]

 

You need to comprehend birth certificate incorporation and monetisation of promissory notes and , and and…

 

Q: Define a Right.

 

Refer: Mark Passio and Justinian Deception and many. many moar. Just don't be ignorant of IT.