>Coronavirus first emerged in southern China near its border with Kyrgyzstan
How the fuck is southern China near Kyrgyzstan?
Where'd you get that inference from?
Kyrgyzstan is neither mentioned in the RT article, nor in the PNAS paper.
Instead the PNAS paper mentions the SouthChina coastal city & province of Guangdong, which is nowhere near Kyrgyzstan.
The inference to Kyrgyzstan that anon tried to force is really suspicious.
[933968] uses too much bold, pretends to read/research papers but can't get simple geography right.
One might almost come to think it's a (chinese?) diversion from the lab in Wuhan.
Too suspicious & therefore not notable in my book.
>posting sauce not a report. figuring links thats all.
Sure. By making inferences where there's no reason or indication for them.
You tried to uselssly connect South China to Kyrgyzstan (by geographical proximity) and to the Coronavirus when there's not a single indication for that neither in the article you cite, nor the paper that's mentioned.
Learn geography, is the nicest advice I can give you.
Thanks for clarifying.
Link to some biolab in Kyrgyzstan is just too speculative with no indications/reasons given whatsoever.
Now that everybody focusses their attention on the lab in Wuhan, this story/paper from this "Peter Forster et al." comes out….
"et al" btw are two other Forsters (Lucy & Michael) and one Colin Renfrew.
Knowing what I know about Chinese money in US institutions, I'd have a good look at where these people got there money from previously, just to make sure ….