> m&m = mason & mason
Imagine understanding the world around you through a thought process like this.
>Just mail everyone a case of tonic water.
You would need to drink about 8 liters of the stuff per day to match one does of HCQS. I did the math a while back:
>>8755299 (PB)
>>8755373 (PB)
>Royal Raymond Rife saw the first virus under a microscope
Viruses are much too small to be seen with optical microscopes. He was a fraud.
This isn't an electron microscope.
>This will go viral if it's accurate. Any debunkers?
It's not erroneous. But like most of what NNN puts out it's a lot of up-spin. He jumps from Trump saying "we're looking into it" to "IT'S UNDER INVESTIGATION! OMG!!"
This guy also seems to be among the contingent that believes the virus was engineered in that lab (it was a natural virus that leaked or was released).
This vid from 2 weeks ago is worth reposting/rewatching. We already know when, where, how, and by whom the virus was released.
What makes this guy more credible, I think, is that he is NOT normally involved in the internet conspiratorium and has great familiarity with China.
>My take is that CRISPR was likely not necessary. I won't rule it out, but they really could have just forced "natural" mechanisms in order to transferbtraits between the coronaviruses.
This might be plausible.
We are currently capable of swapping out whole genes and making small tweaks. But fully engineering new organisms is beyond when they could have possibly done. And the differences between SARS and SARS-2 are quite significant. That's why I'm extremely skeptical of claims that this this was concocted in a lab. It's possible that a virus could have been tweaked to make it more contagious…but they would have needed to start with the discovery of a new strain. Accidental leaks or deliberately timed intentional recklessness are adequate explanations.
Checked the first link and found that it's a YT channel that churns out these fakes (pic related).
Didn't bother with the other links.
>The only Q-related accounts that get "banned" by Twitter are the fake accounts, which pretend to be supporters of Q, but which are all just lackeys of @jack.
Why would @jack ban his own lackeys?