Anonymous ID: 487b4d April 19, 2020, 12:45 a.m. No.8848344   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>8382 >>8388

>>8848321

scottish rite is not scottish?

sorry but the rest was as if you understood yet apparently do not…

 

the rite was not scottish per se but it was indeed the rite that the scottish masons observed….

 

here is the disinfo that confuses you apparently….

 

"Legend of Jacobite origins

The seed of the myth of Stuart Jacobite influence on the higher degrees may have been a careless and unsubstantiated remark made by John Noorthouk in the 1784 Book of Constitutions of the Premier Grand Lodge of London. It was stated, without support, that King Charles II (older brother and predecessor to James II) was made a Freemason in the Netherlands during the years of his exile (1649–60). However, there were no documented lodges of Freemasons on the continent during those years. The statement may have been made to flatter the fraternity by claiming membership for a previous monarch. This folly was then embellished by John Robison (1739–1805), a professor of Natural Philosophy at the University of Edinburgh, in an anti-Masonic work published in 1797. The lack of scholarship exhibited by Robison in that work caused the Encyclopædia Britannica to denounce it.[4]"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scottish_Rite#Scottish_Perfection_Lodges

 

it is nothing more than templars and rosicrucians in hiding…. hiding from what? SMART SMART ANON?