Anonymous ID: 7990e5 April 18, 2020, 11:54 p.m. No.8848162   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8180 >>8183 >>8368 >>8435

Fuck it. I dunno what else to contribute, so here's a coronavirus dump.

 

>In November of 2015, a University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill gain-of-function study, headed by Ralph Baric, created a chimera using surface proteins from the SHC014 coronavirus and the backbone of a virus that causes SARS symptoms in mice. It was found that this manmade virus could infect human airways.

 

https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/lab-made-coronavirus-triggers-debate-34502

 

>One of the people who co-wrote the paper was listed as the Chinese researcher Xing-Ye Gi. >Google scholar shows Gi has written or co-written numerous papers on SARS, ebola and coronavirus.

 

https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?as_q=&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=any&as_sauthors=%22Xing-Yi+Ge%22&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_allsubj=all&hl=en

 

>Gi works in Wuhan of all places. Key Laboratory of Special Pathogens and Biosafety, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China. BLS-4 laboratory. Just a few miles from the seafood market where the CCP is claiming this outbreak originated.

>Below is yet another article from nature.com emphasizing gain-of-function studies in SARS-like coronaviruses, one that specifically uses the word "chimera."

 

https://www.nature.com/articles/nm.3985

 

>Further, NCBI's BLAST confirms a genetic match between "Wuhan seafood market pneumonia virus" and one of the coronaviruses mentioned above, specifically in the envelope protein-almost as though it obtained it through a gain-of-function study combining their traits.

Anonymous ID: 7990e5 April 18, 2020, 11:59 p.m. No.8848180   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8211 >>8368 >>8435

>>8848162

Lastly, here is the envelope protein match:

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/AVP78033.1

 

>That's Bat SARS-like coronavirus. Genbank: AVP78033

>Click on "identical proteins" in the upper-left corner and you get two overlaps for "Wuhan seafood market coronavirus."

>Everything suggests that this thing is the product of a gain-of-function study, and when the function gained is infectivity, that is highly suspicious.

Anonymous ID: 7990e5 April 19, 2020, 12:07 a.m. No.8848211   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8848180

 

Now see:

>>8848032

All evidence suggests that this thing is a chimera created by human hands. This thing got human infectivity from one coronavirus the same way that pneumococcal bacteria can just absorb antibiotic-resistance from otger pneumococcal bacteria. The key is the envelope protein, which appears to blend it the function of human airway infectivity and may be derived from SARS bat-like coronavirus.

 

>>8848183

Will do. I intend to document this one as fully as possible. Ty fren

Anonymous ID: 7990e5 April 19, 2020, 12:18 a.m. No.8848265   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8300

>>8848246

My take is that CRISPR was likely not necessary. I won't rule it out, but they really could have just forced "natural" mechanisms in order to transferbtraits between the coronaviruses.