>>8862004
Some of these big names are fairly decent aggregates of info and anon contributions. Many anons welcome that, actually. Some folks despise being on twitter and all the stupid "People Magazine-style" drama that comes with it. Anons are even more put off when folks bring that shit, here, in a workspace where everyone is anon.
Hate on them all you want, but some of them do an exceptional job. Yes, sometimes their commentary is "meh", and they sometimes seem to not understand the big picture by not making any real proclamations other than "Lookey here", but your seething hatred for them speaks volumes more of your efforts to delegitimize them for their work than it does their ability to draw in more patriots to the movement.
Instead of hating on folks doing a thing, why don't you provide an expert analysis on why USA, Russia, and SA are obviously coordinating an effort to crush the crude markets and drive out the DS competition by bankrupting their oil fields? Big names are going to constantly get caught up in running the popularity race, while anons continue to push out raw digs. Let them run that race. As long as more patriots get on board, that's all that really matters.
In other words, don't be a division fag. It's really not worth it.