Anonymous ID: ef0a2a April 21, 2020, 10:16 a.m. No.8874282   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8873952

While I try not to be too attached to Blavatsky (especially having read little of her work), I've been told many times that what I speak of correlates heavily with her message.

Anyway, with my preemptive defense out of the way, it should be explained that Blavatsky's predecessor(s) were the ones that corrupted her initial message.

Annie Besant, I believe, was the one that really fathered (in a sense) what became of Theosophy, forming Lucius Trust.

She was a sinister lady and clearly perverted Blavatsky's intended message.

 

I don't see the same issue with Blavatsky that many others seem to. I think her initial assertions were tainted and the corrupted version of her message(s) were only really popularized after her death.

Do you suspect she knew what became of her work after dying? Do you suspect she'd be happy about it?

 

I've long thought Blavatsky tapped in to a certain pool of knowledge that many assumed she wouldn't (we're talking people in the orders and other such faggots that keep secrets), which I believe is what enticed people to swoop in after her death and invert her intended message and mold her as having been one of [their] agents instead.

 

Is it any surprise to those with eyes to see that a movement centered around "divine knowledge", procured by ancient and hidden ways, would become tainted and twisted in to something sinister, used by faggots [they] work with, to gatekeep said "divine knowledge" from Norman?

 

That whole development seems all too convenient.

This is why people are desperate (like the church…) to give Gnosticism a bad rap (in it's original form, mind you. I think little to nothing of groups that currently define themselves that way, largely due to their vivid infiltration), going so far as to name a list of "heretical books" "Gnostic Texts" (anchored term, substituted for "bad", unwittingly prompting people like me to take a closer look).

 

The Jesuits are faggot secret keepers and it should be exactly no surprise to anyone willing to take a look that they'd pull this bullshit. While I don't suspect they're the only ones with the passion or focus to pull something like this off, they certainly appear to be a main culprit.

Either way, I'm curious to see how other people perceive this potential circumstance.

Anonymous ID: ef0a2a April 21, 2020, 10:28 a.m. No.8874366   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8874059

ding ding ding

Most should realize by now that el-ites don't raise their own children. Instead, they're typically shipped off to another place to be raised by very specific people for very specific reasons.

Most of the explanation lies in their desire for their children to not be mere replicas of themselves (for various reasons), but they also agree in a pragmatic sense, it seems, that certain roles need to be filled and that while they're being raised they can fulfill those roles to varying extents.

Their children are taught to purge fear, be more inclined with the occult aspects of [their] society, how to trick the profane/goryim, how to conduct themselves, etc.

Most of [them] are often very busy people…

 

Take Elon Musk for example.

Anonymous ID: ef0a2a April 21, 2020, 10:33 a.m. No.8874407   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8874304

operating without perceived risk of flawed security

any employee can access sizable portions of info

vigilante hackers aren't being thought of

flagrant lack of concern for company's protection or authorization

 

not only should this violate compliance laws and the sort, this should exhibit an explicit disregard for securing information… meaning, they could easily be sharing this info with China, sort of like HRC did with the server.

 

Am I close, anon?

Anonymous ID: ef0a2a April 21, 2020, 10:35 a.m. No.8874434   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4508

>>8874348

>gatekeeping tonics

yeah, they're a bigger reason they're doing this

elixers, tonics, potions, etc. all point toward al-chem

Norman isn't supposed to think about these things and instead is supposed to write them off as mystical fantasies that have no basis in reality. their doctors and scientists told them so.

Anonymous ID: ef0a2a April 21, 2020, 10:39 a.m. No.8874463   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8874374

A popular opinion is that it's McAfee.

I've enjoyed this idea because it speaks to how often he gets attacked, be it physically or otherwise.

Anonymous ID: ef0a2a April 21, 2020, 10:41 a.m. No.8874482   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8874388

Pretty much.

Why do you think he was so adamant?

Look in to HEK-293, anon.

Look in to Kuru.

Look in to how Impossible Meats is across the fucking road from Planned Parenthood.

What does Burger King get their meat for the Impossible Burger from?…

 

Yes, that anon was annoying and his "work" was unquestionably overkill, but if this isn't a rabbit hole you've gone down yet, you're going to be absolutely mind fucked once it hits the public purview.

Anonymous ID: ef0a2a April 21, 2020, 10:42 a.m. No.8874499   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8874393

2/10 explanation, but normie-tier helpful nonetheless.

Seeing the trees and not the forest may be an issue but I really shouldn't be too critical considering their Norman's overton window…

Anonymous ID: ef0a2a April 21, 2020, 10:47 a.m. No.8874542   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4560 >>4562

>>8874444

No, moran.

It's not "because they're black", it's because people of their profile are most likely to commit crimes, as per empirical evidence, which Norman so often refused to consider perceiving.

 

We've spoken about this for many years, hence:

>Despite being only 13% of the population…

Anonymous ID: ef0a2a April 21, 2020, 10:51 a.m. No.8874574   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8874531

Native species were mated with long ago.

Not all of them, but some of them were marked in various ways (red hair - punishment).

It goes further than this though, as you've suggested.

 

For instance, Cro Magnon has been around much longer than what's typically described.

Aryans were plentiful in Atlantis.

Neanderthal never died.

Anonymous ID: ef0a2a April 21, 2020, 10:56 a.m. No.8874606   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4659

>>8874560

You don't understand.

Real world observations aren't bigoted because you lack preference for them.

These are genuine issues and even if we can all equally agree that this isn't the best time to discuss them, denying them and writing anyone off as "bad guy" because they're willing to correct people about them is irresponsible and at a certain point rather sinister.

 

Grow up.

No one is spreading hate, but truth. If your reaction to this is "let's be violent toward them and take advantage of them", that makes you a fucking asshole. However, all parties can handle this tragedy like adults, we can come to terms with it and find a solution for it, like incentivizing their return to Africa.

Just because you don't enjoy this topic doesn't make me an ebil nazi.

 

Again, grow the fuck up and stop watching CNN.

 

>>8874562

Now this we can agree upon.

The black culture was targeted first and now it's white culture's turn. This is why you see trannies galore, beautiful young ladies in yoga pants and without children, women's studies degrees in absurd numbers, etc.

 

See how we can act like grown ups while also not resorting to "everyone's a nazi"?