While I try not to be too attached to Blavatsky (especially having read little of her work), I've been told many times that what I speak of correlates heavily with her message.
Anyway, with my preemptive defense out of the way, it should be explained that Blavatsky's predecessor(s) were the ones that corrupted her initial message.
Annie Besant, I believe, was the one that really fathered (in a sense) what became of Theosophy, forming Lucius Trust.
She was a sinister lady and clearly perverted Blavatsky's intended message.
I don't see the same issue with Blavatsky that many others seem to. I think her initial assertions were tainted and the corrupted version of her message(s) were only really popularized after her death.
Do you suspect she knew what became of her work after dying? Do you suspect she'd be happy about it?
I've long thought Blavatsky tapped in to a certain pool of knowledge that many assumed she wouldn't (we're talking people in the orders and other such faggots that keep secrets), which I believe is what enticed people to swoop in after her death and invert her intended message and mold her as having been one of [their] agents instead.
Is it any surprise to those with eyes to see that a movement centered around "divine knowledge", procured by ancient and hidden ways, would become tainted and twisted in to something sinister, used by faggots [they] work with, to gatekeep said "divine knowledge" from Norman?
That whole development seems all too convenient.
This is why people are desperate (like the church…) to give Gnosticism a bad rap (in it's original form, mind you. I think little to nothing of groups that currently define themselves that way, largely due to their vivid infiltration), going so far as to name a list of "heretical books" "Gnostic Texts" (anchored term, substituted for "bad", unwittingly prompting people like me to take a closer look).
The Jesuits are faggot secret keepers and it should be exactly no surprise to anyone willing to take a look that they'd pull this bullshit. While I don't suspect they're the only ones with the passion or focus to pull something like this off, they certainly appear to be a main culprit.
Either way, I'm curious to see how other people perceive this potential circumstance.