>>8886949

how is that?

why would that be?

what proof do you have?

the 'apart' phase is which part is apart?

I think instead you use the voice of affirmative truth with statements that you really are without any firm basis and saying as if it's something doctrinaire and important for others to consider. I think your just being a garden variety charliton and you know no more about our apartness or our joinery with either who you say, or anyone else.

the idea of a path having a hand direction? everyone knows that 'left and right' are relative.

thus it shows you just being a sound-off person, with no real message other than 'oh, the world is mysterious and people can easily be fooled by foolish voices. the voices are only foolish in that they seek to fool.

>>8887031

>>8887061

my problem is people in the wrong venue talking theology out of context and trying to create a slide in our bread.

you have 28 posts, anon.

the thing that I disagree with most is that you say we are apart, and maybe it's just you chooseing to be apart.

the real story seems very different to me and involves memory of . . . what is and was and always will be.

we are of course always within full reach however we forget that and thus we do not have the access we would if we would remember to say 'Father I love you!' more often.

we forget.

but you don't preach that, you preach separation.

I'm not reallying giving your Theological spiel much time, bot-like-anon.

you're in the wrong venue for this if you really were who you were larping to be.

and you know this.

It's a free speech board so you do what you want. 30 posts in and you might consider a break. Maybe some house work or laundry?

>>8887233

will we get more of that gape jawed 'am I going MAGA' look from the CBS guy who won the Edward M. award.

He looked like he was being red pilled as he sat there.