>>889464
(previous bread, I believe it deserves careful review)
I see there is a clear sub-thread going on that does not seem to be obvious shill. Appears to be something quite significant. I'm missing something though. Doesn't help that by the time I can get on here is after a long day and I'm pretty beat.
I think he has to be. Why else would he have met with Trump one day prior to appointment? Why would Gowdy/Nunes claim that "history will look kindly on what Mueller is doing". I think Trump calls Mueller's task a "witch hunt", because it's hunting a certain witch that we all know.
It will be interesting to see how Congress and/or SCOTUS deals with Hussein being proven ineligible.
It reminds me of the retroactive patch they had to do to fix this 150-year long oversight: http:// history.house.gov/Historical-Highlights/1951-2000/The-admission-of-Ohio-as-a-state/