Did Baxter contaminate an influenza nasal vaccinewith H5N1 in January 2009 -an attempt to initiate a pandemic?

THE CLAIM (J Burgermeister https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/8860241.html) - Baxter Pharm in Austria added deadly H5N1 (bird flu) to a nasal vaccine in a deliberate attempt to start a pandemic in January 2009.

Background: In 2009 Bird flu, caused by H5N1, had been identified as highly infectious in birds and with a high mortality rate in humans but with low rates of human-to-human transmission.

COMMENT: H5N1 in a nasal vaccine would likely result in high mortality of vaccine recipients.

https://www.who.int/influenza/human_animal_interface/avian_influenza/h5n1_research/faqs/en/

There was also a concern that co-infection with H5N1 and the 2009 seasonal flu strain H3N2 could result in changes making H5N1 more easily transmissible.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23628436

COMMENT: The Baxter nasal vaccine under development was a combination of H5N1 and H3N2 live attenuated (weakened) viruses.

Dig results: The Baxter facility in Orth-Donau, Austria contracted with another Austrian company called Avir Green Hills Biotechnology (Avir) to work on a new nasal flu vaccine. The Baxter Lab in Orth-Donau supplied the virus material to make the vaccine, who forwarded it to a number of other centers in different countries to begin Phase 1 vaccine trials including the Czech Republic (CR), Slovenia and Germany. One of those recipient labs, Biotest in CR, began phase 1 testing by exposing ferrets to the vaccine material. Ferrets are a common animal model for flu testing. In this case the ferrets immediately became very ill, died and set off the alarm that something was wrong with the vaccine. Ultimately it was determined that the vaccine material contained live H5N1 flu virus.

Public reporting began describing vaccine contamination, but was changed By Baxter to say “experimental virus material” but later admitted by Baxter that contamination of the nasal vaccine occurred. While a number of investigations were done in the recipient countries publicly the event was down played as a mistake in the Baxter lab in Austria.

https://www.ctvnews.ca/baxter-admits-flu-product-contained-live-bird-flu-virus-1.374503

https://www.ctvnews.ca/how-were-bird-flu-viruses-sent-to-unsuspecting-labs-1.374153

An investigation by the Czech State Office, Department of Biological Weapons Prohibition “Potential Human Bird Flu Outbreak in the Czech Republic” provides a useful description of the events, actions and failure to warn others involved research centers of the risk.

https://www.unog.ch/80256EDD006B8954/(httpAssets)/06BAA08D71F66860C125775F004C10C8/$file/Karel+Lehmert.Potential+human+Bird+Flu+outbreak+in+the+Czech+Republic.pdf

COMMENT: Without additional details it is difficult to understand how such a “mix-up” of live with attenuated virus would be possible, however proving intent to cause a pandemic is a challenge. IMHO however it cannot be ruled out based on the fact that within weeks another flu pandemic began with evidence of a laboratory produced H1N1 swine flu. H1N1 info: https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/8886578.html

CONCLUSION: This information, together with current Corona virus-related events, would tend to support Burgmeister’s argument that there was (and is?) work to create biological threat and force mandatory vaccinations which could then be “accidentally” contaminated if the “wrong” people are involved.