>>8901402
>someone taking notes?
>>8901386
>another paper on 222 nm light:
>
>http://www.columbia.edu/~djb3/papers/Germicidal%20Efficacy%20and%20Mammalian%20Skin%20Safety%20of%20222-nm%20UV%20Light.pdf
>>8901194
>>8901125
>
>will kill any vampire.
>
>as a side note UV-C Light kills viruses and bacteria that it can touch in a short amount of time.
>
>THE BEST UV-C wavelength
>
>the best wavelength is 222nm, and is too short of a wavelength to harm a person's skin or even eyes. there are companies that make these lights…
>>8901275
>>8901154
>
>222nm is best. other uvc that is more commonly available can cause harm to a person, and is less effective.
>>8901316
>he was not giving me the sauce so I found it
>
>222nm Light sauce:
>
>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5552051/
>>8901332
>>8901154
>
>>8901275 (me)
>
>in addition, the other types of UVC light can cause ozone generation if the light tube is not properly glazed. (the mercury based lamps are problematic for this)
>
>common name for 222nm wavelength is "Far UVC".
>
>My research so far is that typical generation of UVC light in the FAR UVC 222nm wavelength is by an Excimer lamp, using specific gases.
>>8901346
>222 nm light disinfectant
https://www.ushio.com/product/care222-mercury-free-far-uv-c-excimer/
>>8901367
>another study on 222nm light:
>
>https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0201259
baker, notable
222nm light bun notes