Anonymous ID: 5141cc April 24, 2020, 1:01 p.m. No.8910570   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0609 >>0683

>>8910543

Our role re: news is two-fold.

Anons never forget that Q told us to analyze each day's news in light of re_reading the crumbs.

That means we do need to keep our eyes on all kinds of news, since from time to time we do expect to find correlations with things Q has said, which will shed further light on the whole operation.

Excluding news just because you think there's too much of it does not make sense in light of our dual duties to inspect the news and to discover/uncover/publish news not found by MSM sources.

Anonymous ID: 5141cc April 24, 2020, 1:08 p.m. No.8910663   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0863 >>0891 >>1060

>>8910581

There are layers within this movement.

QResearch right here is the center and has been following/analyzing Q drops the longest. The autists hang out here. More recently, we have had people arrive here who have not yet spent a long time with Q.

There is a second layer that takes info from here and reformulates it, or does their own analysis of Q, and drops it onto more "mainstream" type sites.

And probably 3rd and 4th layers that are further removed from the source. People that heard about Q through a youtube video or a friend or a discussion forum.

 

It takes patience, here, to discern frens from shills. Hating, labelling, baiting, ad hominem attacks, etc. here all come from shills who wish to drive away normies and discredit anons. After a while it gets very easy to spot them when you analyze motivation and pick up repetitive patterns.

I can't speak for what's going on outside of QResearch but it seems likely that shilly activities are present everywhere people are talking about Q. Q predicted that attacks would intensity.

People are in different stages of their own personal Great Awakenings, some very early, some quite a bit more matured/seasoned/aware.

 

Can we show them love and patience? Can we exemplify what we are learning from Q, through our own words and actions?

<3